Hi,
I updated my production oVirt environment from 4.3.3 to 4.3.5 today.
Everything went fine so far, but there's one annoying phenomenon:
When I log into the "Administration Portal" and request the VM list
("/ovirt-engine/webadmin/?locale=en_US#vms") engine.log is flooded with
lines like
You can't bond a bond, nor to layer a teaming device ontop a bond ... There was
an article about that.
If it worked - most probably it won't as you wish.
Lacp can play active-backup based on aggregation group, but you need all NICs
in the same LACP.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Aug 9,
Hey Shanii,
Thank you for the reply.
Sure, I will attach the full logs asap.
What do you mean by “flow you are doing”?
Kindly awaiting your reply.
Marko Vrgotic
From: Shani Leviim
Date: Thursday, 8 August 2019 at 00:01
To: "Vrgotic, Marko"
Cc: "users@ovirt.org"
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users]
I'd be happy to take a look at the process from a UX perspective. Would
anyone be able to document a series of screenshots or a video of the end to
end experience of it?
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:11 AM Martin Perina wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:25 AM Sandro Bonazzola
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:25 AM Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 23:17 Jayme ha
> scritto:
>
>> I’m aware of the heal process but it’s unclear to me if the update
>> continues to run while the volumes are healing and resumes when they are
>> done. There doesn’t
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:04 PM Strahil wrote:
> I think poison pill-based fencing is easier to implement but it requires
> either Network-based (iSCSI or NFS) or FC-based shared storage.
>
> It is used in corosync/pacemaker clusters and is easier to implement.
>
Corosync/pacemake uses
Il giorno ven 9 ago 2019 alle ore 04:34 ha
scritto:
> The version of ovirt-engine is 4.3.5.5-1.el7
>
>
> The version of ovirt-node-2 is 4.3.5.2-1.el7
>
> When I add ovirt-node-2 to ovirt-engine ，it report:
> VDSM ovirt-node-2 command Get Host Capabilities failed: Internal JSON-RPC
> error:
On 08. 08. 2019 11:42, Strahil wrote:
>
> LACP supports works with 2 switches, but if you wish to aggregate all
> links - you need switch support (high-end hardware).
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
I am aware of that. That's why my idea was to use bond1 (LACP) on eth1+2
on switch1 and
8 matches
Mail list logo
