[ovirt-users] Re: Thin pool best proctices

2019-10-07 Thread Oliver Riesener
Hi Jeremy, thanks for sharing your experience here. I am not a lvmthin expert, but in the past the **fstrim** command works fine for my needs. See "Using fstrim to increase free space in a thin pool LV“ - http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/lvmthin.7.html

[ovirt-users] Thin pool best proctices

2019-10-07 Thread jeremy_tourville
After a week of downtime from a thin pool that had 100% full metadata I decided to rebuild my single node. My post was formerly titled: Ovirt 4.2.7 won't start and drops to emergency console. I have backups of nearly all my VMs and I am working on importing them. I went from version 4.2.7.1

[ovirt-users] Re: Problem with logical network

2019-10-07 Thread Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis
OVIRT Version: 4.2.7.5-1.el7 ovs-vsctl show output: 21c14833-c5cb-460c-8985-bef8543f889b     ovs_version: "2.9.0" ovs-vsctl list open output: _uuid   : 21c14833-c5cb-460c-8985-bef8543f889b bridges : [] cur_cfg : 1 datapath_types  : [netdev,

[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt Software after upgrade

2019-10-07 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il giorno lun 30 set 2019 alle ore 16:11 Rick A ha scritto: > I'm wondering why after upgrading our hosts, when viewing the host > details, it's still showing the OS Description as 4.3.3.1. We are using the > oVirt Node. Shouldn't the OS Description show the version we just upgraded > to? I do

[ovirt-users] Re: Problem with logical network

2019-10-07 Thread Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 7:15 AM Strahil wrote: > > Can you check your hosts and especially their networks. > If any network is not OK (out of sync), you can fix it from the UI. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > On Oct 4, 2019 23:47, Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis wrote: > > Hello, I'm trying to

[ovirt-users] Re: Trying to add a LUN to a host and use that, instead of Gluster, as the datastore for my VM's.

2019-10-07 Thread TomK
Allright. So I followed this and configured local storage. It had some default names that I changed. It would have been either the default name, or one I choose. In either case it would be a different name then the Gluster storage domain the host was a part of anyway. Once the process

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage/Ceph: Experiences from Catastrophic Hardware failure

2019-10-07 Thread Benny Zlotnik
We support it as part of the cinderlib integration (Managed Block Storage), each rbd device is represented as single ovirt disk when used. The integration is still in tech preview and still has a long way to go, but any early feedback is highly appreciated On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:20 PM Strahil

[ovirt-users] Re: Managed Block Storage/Ceph: Experiences from Catastrophic Hardware failure

2019-10-07 Thread Strahil
Hi Dan, As CEPH support is quite new, we need DEV clarification. Hi Sandro, Who can help to clarify if Ovirt supports direct RBD LUNs presented on the VMs? Are there any limitations in the current solution ? Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Oct 7, 2019 13:54, Dan Poltawski wrote: > > On Mon,

[ovirt-users] Re: VDI

2019-10-07 Thread Leo David
Thank you very much for the informations. I'm am sorry for my lack of knowledge, but the vGPU / vm graphical performance part is a bit confusing for me at the moment. As far as i've understood, if some real decent graphical performance is needed for the vms, the only proper way is to install a