,
> Strahil NikolovOn Aug 23, 2019 23:19, "Curtis E. Combs Jr."
> wrote:
> >
> > It took a while for my servers to come back on the network this time.
> > I think it's due to ovirt continuing to try to migrate the VMs around
> > like I requested. The 3 serve
ts little fit, I can
change the migration network to either the 1g or 10g networks. So I
could set up a ping and let it go like I was saying before. It's worth
a shot
>
> On Sat., 24 Aug. 2019, 04:20 Curtis E. Combs Jr., wrote:
>>
>> It took a while for my servers to c
Dominik Holler wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:03 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This little cluster isn't in production or anything like that yet.
>>>
>>> So, I went ahead and used your ethtool command
ssh, and the SSH session that I had open was unresponsive.
Any other ideas?
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:50 PM Dominik Holler wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:45 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, I can't check on the switch. Trust me, I
PM Dominik Holler wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:49 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
> wrote:
>>
>> Sure! Right now, I only have a 500gb partition on each node shared over NFS,
>> added as storage domains. This is on each node - so, currently 3.
>>
>>
ble.
>>
>>
> Can you share some details about your storage?
> Maybe there is a feature used during live migration, which triggers the
> issue.
>
>
>
>> These are vanilla-as-possible CentOS7 nodes. Very basic ovirt install
>> and configuration.
>>
&
install
and configuration.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:33 AM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
wrote:
>
> Hey Dominik,
>
> Thanks for helping. I really want to try to use ovirt.
>
> When these events happen, I cannot even SSH to the nodes due to the
> link being down. After a little while
ia NFS?
> Can you manually access the storage on the host?
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:19 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry to dead bump this, but I'm beginning to suspect that maybe it's
>> not STP that's the problem.
>>
>> 2 of my hosts just
ng state ID with
incorrect client ID
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:53 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr. wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'm just going to revert back to bridges.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:50 AM Dominik Holler wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 3:06 PM
Thanks, I'm just going to revert back to bridges.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:50 AM Dominik Holler wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 3:06 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
> wrote:
>>
>> Seems like the STP options are so common and necessary that it would
>> be a prio
Seems like the STP options are so common and necessary that it would
be a priority over seldom-used bridge_opts. I know what STP is and I'm
not even a networking guy - never even heard of half of the
bridge_opts that have switches in the UI.
Anyway. I wanted to try the openvswitches, so I
l option and it's probably one
of the more common networking configurations
Again, if there's some other way to do this, please, please do let me know.
Thanks again, Tony!
cecjr
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:51 AM Curtis E. Combs Jr.
wrote:
> Oh, I'm just using the standard Linux bridges. I
er bridge. The only other
> option I was aware of if what I am using, vlan interfaces and kernel vlan
> tags. If you could share a link to what you're using, I would be keen to
> read up on it to know more.
>
> *Tony Pearce*
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 16:27, Cu
g and the blocking to occur elsewhere.
>
>
> Tony Pearce
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 10:12, Curtis E. Combs Jr.
> wrote:
> >
> > Cool, I can capture some packets tomorrow when I'm in the office and
> > see how that compares...
> >
> > But, yea, it's a has
gt;
> Glad you're all working :)
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Pearce
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 09:52, Curtis E. Combs Jr. wrote:
> >
> > Hey Tony!
> >
> > I only know the basics of Spanning Tree. At the current moment the
> > only way to get mig
are named the same for each host. Each bridge has a
different IP address that corresponds to the NIC attached to the host
on that network. It seemed like the only and obvious choice...
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:52 PM Curtis E. Combs Jr. wrote:
>
> Hey Tony!
>
> I only know the b
Hey Tony!
I only know the basics of Spanning Tree. At the current moment the
only way to get migrations to work at all without breaking the whole
oVirt cluster is to have it on. After changing it according to Paul's
instruction, it works like it has never worked before. Every migration
event was
Hi Paul,
Thank you very much for the response. However, I have tried those
options. Adding "stp=on" does not enable STP on the bridges. Each node
has a 1Gb Ethernet connection as well as a 10Gb FC connection, I've
tried moving the VM migration network to each and the effect is the
same.
The vdsm
18 matches
Mail list logo
