Hello,
just wanted to know if enabling virt-preview repo on a
FC20 hypervisor node may break Ovirt 3.4.1. Especially
the incompatible changes mentioned here:
http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/2.0#Incompatible_changes
FC20 stock: qemu 1.6.2
FC20 virt-previe: qemu 2.0.0
Best regards.
Markus
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.comwrote:
Looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle
I think that with F21 you'll have Fedora Server 1.0 preview 1.
Fedora Server 1.0 final release will be based on F23.
Ah, ok. I didn't see
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.comwrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a
stable supported oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle
of 18
months:
I migrated the engin on a F19 and reimported the db so I'm ok
So I'playing with F20 to see if it may run as node but have this
error on vdsm
vdsm vds ERROR unexpected error
Traceback (most recent
call last):
File
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Alessandro Bianchi a.bian...@skynet.itwrote:
I migrated the engin on a F19 and reimported the db so I'm ok
So I'playing with F20 to see if it may run as node but have this error on
vdsm
vdsm vds ERROR unexpected error
Il 16/05/2014 14:26, Gianluca Cecchi
ha scritto:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM,
Alessandro Bianchi a.bian...@skynet.it
wrote:
I migrated the engin
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alessandro Bianchi a.bian...@skynet.itwrote:
mmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312
it seems there is no vdsm in updates-testing repo
rpm -q vdsm
vdsm-4.14.6-0.fc20.x86_64
yum upgrade vdsm --enablerepo=updates-testing
Plugin
Il 16/05/2014 14:50, Gianluca Cecchi
ha scritto:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM,
Alessandro Bianchi a.bian...@skynet.it
wrote:
Il 16/05/2014 16:00, Gianluca
Cecchi ha scritto:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM,
Alessandro Bianchi a.bian...@skynet.it
wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable
supported oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18
months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable
supported oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18
months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent announce
of CentOS sponsored by
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully supported as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully supported as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Not yet AFAIK.
Bug tracker as RFE for it is here:
Well, as already noted in the BZ it is quite a mess
because atm it's used to track engine and node/vdsm
related bugs for fedora 20, which should get separated.
Am 02.05.2014 11:11, schrieb Gianluca Cecchi:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:11:58AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully supported as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
I updated the environment to support f20, including new slave and nighlites.
i will send a separate email on it soon to infra/users/devel.
Eyal.
- Original Message -
From: Doron Fediuck dfedi...@redhat.com
To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com, David Caro Estevez
dcaro...@redhat.com
We've forgotten to discuss an important issue: Fedora 20, which is
expected to be out in two weeks:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule.
I believe that ovirt-3.4 must support it, and that ovirt-3.3.2 would
better do so.
Toni has fixed two issues regarding Vdsm-networking, and they
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: bo...@ovirt.org, users users@ovirt.org
Cc: Doron Fediuck dfedi...@redhat.com, ee...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:19:05 PM
Subject: Fedora 20 support, Was: [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes --
If I am not mistaken, the EL6 builds do not support native Gluster,
which in his case may be nice to have.
-
Thomas
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]quot; im Auftrag von
quot;Thomas Suckow [thomas.suc...@pnnl.gov]
Gesendet: Montag, 25. November 2013 18:11
An: users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: [Users] Fedora 20
If I am not mistaken, the EL6 builds do not support native Gluster,
which
On 11/23/2013 07:44 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Itamar Heim wrote:
well, no. 3.3 isn't tested/packaged for f20.
just wondering, if you're looking to avoid os upgrades, rather than keen
on latest, why fedora over centos/rhel as engine/nodes?
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just
Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. November 2013 11:54
An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] Fedora 20
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just gives a better
feeling in a 10GBit NFS environment. That comes from several
would
On 11/24/2013 06:28 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. November 2013 11:54
An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] Fedora 20
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just gives a better
feeling in a 10GBit NFS
Hello,
after a few months of testing I'm ready to migrate some
of our test VMs into the OVirt infrastructure. This will
hopefully start in january and until to then I would like to
take care that everything is in place.
To avoid later OS upgrades I'm interested if it makes
sense to jump on the
On 11/23/2013 02:17 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
after a few months of testing I'm ready to migrate some
of our test VMs into the OVirt infrastructure. This will
hopefully start in january and until to then I would like to
take care that everything is in place.
To avoid later OS
Itamar Heim wrote:
well, no. 3.3 isn't tested/packaged for f20.
just wondering, if you're looking to avoid os upgrades, rather than keen
on latest, why fedora over centos/rhel as engine/nodes?
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just gives a better
feeling in a 10GBit NFS
26 matches
Mail list logo
