[Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-17 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Hey, as many of you have noticed there wasn't any well working oVirt Node ISO around for oVirt 3.3. To get this ball rolling again I've put together a draft image of ALPHA quality. It contains many fixes some of us have been working on over the last weeks. - Source & ISO - To not drown Jenkins in

Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-17 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Hi Laercio, Am Freitag, den 17.01.2014, 14:49 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > I tested the ISO here. Thanks for being that brave! ;) > - I was able to register with the engine and aprove (thing with > 'oVirt-node-3.0.1-iso-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso' version was not possible) Great that this works now

Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-17 Thread Laercio Motta
Hi, > Could you explain this a bit more? > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. And in this case it got messed up: common: eth0 -> port 1 eth1 -> port 2 ethx >> port X What happened: eth0 -> port 1 eth4 -> port 3 eth5 -> port 4 eth6 -> port

Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-20 Thread Laercio Motta
Understand?? o.0 2014/1/17 Laercio Motta > Hi, > > > > Could you explain this a bit more? > > Did all NICs appear, or did to many NICs appear? > > I'm used to udev leave my NIC in sequence. > And in this case it got messed up: > common: > eth0 -> port 1 > eth1 -> port 2 > ethx >> port X > > Wha

Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-20 Thread Fabian Deutsch
Am Montag, den 20.01.2014, 13:10 -0200 schrieb Laercio Motta: > Understand?? o.0 Hey Laercio, sorry for the delay. I think I do understand the problem: The NIC order is different the previously, right? When you configure a NIC you cna use the button to identify a special NIC. We won't change t

Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO for oVirt 3.3 - Draft image for testing

2014-01-20 Thread Laercio Motta
No problem. But I believe this is because the file already has something. Or he's duplicating information. As you can see in the file I sent, the MAC of NIC and eth1 eth6 are the same .. Well, we stayed anyway: P 2014/1/20 Fabian Deutsch > Am Montag, den 20.01.2014, 13:10 -0200 schrieb Laercio