On 12/07/2017 01:10 AM, Richard Chan wrote:
What is the best practice for iSCSI storage domains:
Many small targets vs a few large targets?
Specific example: if you wanted a 8TB storage domain would you prepare a
single 8TB LUN or (for example) 8 x 1 TB LUNs.
There's no "best" answer for thi
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Richard Chan > wrote:
>
>> What is the best practice for iSCSI storage domains:
>>
>> Many small targets vs a few large targets?
>>
>> Specific example: if you wanted a 8TB storage domain would you prepare a
>
That's one of the reasons I prefer File storage (like NFS) than iSCSI or
Fiberchannel. A lot more flexible and manageable.
In the past for VMFS5 I used to work with 4TB LUNs. Now a days something
between 4TB and 8TB may be ok given the bigger size of VMs, depending on
your enviroment of course
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Richard Chan
wrote:
> What is the best practice for iSCSI storage domains:
>
> Many small targets vs a few large targets?
>
> Specific example: if you wanted a 8TB storage domain would you prepare a
> single 8TB LUN or (for example) 8 x 1 TB LUNs.
>
There could be
What is the best practice for iSCSI storage domains:
Many small targets vs a few large targets?
Specific example: if you wanted a 8TB storage domain would you prepare a
single 8TB LUN or (for example) 8 x 1 TB LUNs.
--
Richard Chan
___
Users mailing
5 matches
Mail list logo