[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-13 Thread Eyal Shenitzky
Sorry for the late response, please see my comments inline. On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 02:30, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for your reply, but I already did all of that but I didn't > understand everything and I got several problems on the way of doing the > fail-over then a fail-back. I

[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-02 Thread wodel youchi
Hi, Thank you for your reply, but I already did all of that but I didn't understand everything and I got several problems on the way of doing the fail-over then a fail-back. I am writing this mail in hope to clarify those things. I will try to express my self correctly and give as much details as

[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-02 Thread Eyal Shenitzky
If you intention is to use active-passive disaster recovery solution, you can have a look at the following guild: https://ovirt.org/documentation/disaster-recovery-guide/active_passive_overview.html On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 16:42, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to configure and test

[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-01 Thread wodel youchi
Hi, I am trying to configure and test disaster recovery on ovirt HCI And to understand how it works What is the minimum RPO and its relationship with checkpoint And what are the steps to fail back Regards Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 14:16, Eyal Shenitzky a écrit : > Hi Wodel, > > Can you please

[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-01 Thread Eyal Shenitzky
Hi Wodel, Can you please explain what you are trying to do? I am not sure I understand it from your question. On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 12:55, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi, > > I re-did the test and it seems that the minimum RPO is one day and if > someone could confirm that would be great > > As for

[ovirt-users] Re: DR on hyperconverged deployment

2020-04-01 Thread wodel youchi
Hi, I re-did the test and it seems that the minimum RPO is one day and if someone could confirm that would be great As for the snapshot this time it was synced Then I tried to test the fail back and I found that the documentation is not clear : - it is not clear what is the purpose of the