Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Nir Soffer
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Yura Poltoratskiy wrote: > > > 26.01.2017 11:11, Nir Soffer пишет: >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Yura Poltoratskiy >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
26.01.2017 11:11, Nir Soffer пишет: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Yura Poltoratskiy wrote: Hi, I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is to map rbd volume to all computes and to get the same block device, say /dev/foo/bar, across all

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Nir Soffer
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Yura Poltoratskiy wrote: > Hi, > > I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is to > map rbd volume to all computes and to get the same block device, say > /dev/foo/bar, across all nodes, and then use "POSIX

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-26 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
2017-01-25 21:01 GMT+02:00 Logan Kuhn : > We prefer Ceph too and we've got our ovirt instance configured in two > different ways. > > 1. Openstack Cinder, each VM's disk will have a single volume in ceph with > all volumes being under the same pool. > I am familiar

Re: [ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-25 Thread Logan Kuhn
We prefer Ceph too and we've got our ovirt instance configured in two different ways. 1. Openstack Cinder, each VM's disk will have a single volume in ceph with all volumes being under the same pool. 2. Export an RBD via NFS from a gateway machine, this can be a trivially small physical or

[ovirt-users] posix compliant fs with ceph rbd

2017-01-25 Thread Yura Poltoratskiy
Hi, I want to use Ceph with oVirt in some non standard way. The main idea is to map rbd volume to all computes and to get the same block device, say /dev/foo/bar, across all nodes, and then use "POSIX compliant file systems" option to add Storage Domain. Am I crazy? If not, what should I do