Re: Java atomic bindings Was: Re: Queue creation/deletion

Andrew Wright wrote: Yes indeed - we are aware of the active-active apid clustering - it's a good thing! There is currently debate going on as to the relative merits of a centralised, active-active qpid cluster vs. local brokers on active-active application nodes. Given we're looking at using

Re: Java atomic bindings Was: Re: Queue creation/deletion

Yes indeed - we are aware of the active-active apid clustering - it's a good thing! There is currently debate going on as to the relative merits of a centralised, active-active qpid cluster vs. local brokers on active- active application nodes. Given we're looking at using durable topic su

Re: Java atomic bindings Was: Re: Queue creation/deletion

2009/1/29 Carl Trieloff : > > Have you given the Qpid Active-Active cluster a spin yet? did you know we > had one.. I had assumed from the description I had read that the HA here was around the client apps not the broker? Is that right Adam? RG ---

Re: qpid broker on windows

Hi Arun, I've udapted the feature list at: http://qpid.apache.org/qpid-java-documentation.html If there's anything specific you need to know, please do ask. Regards, Marnie On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:11 AM, spaace wrote: > Hello Marnie, > > Thanks for the quick reply. I'm basically trying to

Re: qpid broker on windows

The specification defines durability, transactions, etc. the 0-10 specification also defines the fail-over handlers etc, for client interop which is used to in our Active-Active cluster implementation. What implementation is provided for these abilities in the spec is up to the implementer.

Re: qpid broker on windows

Searching the archives showed me some broken test cases being reported. If someone has that full list it would be really helpful in making a final decision Hello Arun, I played with OpenAMQ for a bit before working with the QPid broker. I just went all the way with QPid because I could not

Re: qpid broker on windows

>durable message support, transactions, ... Thanks for the reply Carl. Are these features part of the AMQP standards or are these extensions that QPID has defined? I thought storage and forward was part of AMQP standards. Searching the archives showed me some broken test cases being reported. If

Re: qpid broker on windows

Arun, I quick look at the download page will show what is compat with what http://qpid.apache.org/download.html In terms of which way to go, obviously I would recommend a Qpid broker... ok, seriously, both the Qpid broker are more feature rich that OpenAMQ. For example they don't have things

Re: Java atomic bindings Was: Re: Queue creation/deletion

Have you given the Qpid Active-Active cluster a spin yet? did you know we had one.. i.e. we can do full Active Active clustering out the box with the C++ broker. it add about .35ms round trip latency on latencytest to keep a 4 node A-A cluster fully in sync Carl. Andrew Wright wrote: Yes,

Re: Best Practice for Transient Sessions?

Obviously auto_delete doesn't work here - but are these queues discarded when the session is closed? yes, when the session closes - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Intera

Re: qpid broker on windows

Hello Marnie, Thanks for the quick reply. I'm basically trying to evaluate different broker implementations for my project, having decided on AMQP for its open standard. I have decided on QPID as my client and is currently evaluating the QPID Java / C++ broker and the OpenAMQ broker for the server

Re: qpid broker on windows

Hi, I can give you a brief overview, and I'm sure that others (particularly the C++-ers) will add to this reply. Fundamentally, it's all about choice. Our project seeks to provide a range of client & broker implementations of the AMQP specification (and JMS for the Java elements) from which our u

Re: c# message retreival without resorting to encodings and bytes readers?

Hi, I have create a JIRA for this issue: see *QPID-1620 . *It would be nice to comment on this JIRA so we can make a decision and add the new API. Thanks Arnaud falconair wrote: (sorry for the late response, thought I already replied) As a u

RE: qpid broker on windows

Hi, I'm new to Qpid and have been following the threads and reading up on the docs for some time. I'm trying to decide on the brokers to be used for a private project and have this doubt. Why are multiple brokers that bring with them additional compatibility requirements being developed by QPID ?

Re: qpid broker on windows

See what you mean, thanks. The Qpid roadmap shows 0-10 implementation on the Java broker as one of our next big ticket deliveries. This would mean that the C++ client could again interop with the Java broker. On the C# front, we are discussing on the dev list the strategic solution going forward,

Re: Java atomic bindings Was: Re: Queue creation/deletion

Yes, that's right. We're looking at in-memory replicated clustering technologies (eg. Terracotta/Coherence etc) in an active-active style setup. Cheers, Andrew On 28 Jan 2009, at 23:44, Robert Greig wrote: 2009/1/22 Andrew Wright : Background: we're examining ways to get reliable app-leve