Re: Errors starting qman WSDM

2009-08-31 Thread Andrea Gazzarini
Any news about this topic? Andrea On 8/27/09, Andrea Gazzarini wrote: > Yes, you're absolutely right. > > I see in your log that the hostname is not localhost but ubuntu so try this > : > > http://ubuntu:8080/qman/console.jsp > > Let me know > > Regards, > Andrea > > > 2009/8/27 Rich Stephens >

Re: Processing then acknowledging message from broker.

2009-08-31 Thread Carl Trieloff
Jason Jones wrote: John thanks for replying. I am using the C++ QPID client library. I am using the SubscriptionManager and MessageListener classes to receive a message. So are you saying that when the method MessageListener::received() is called the message is received, but still on the qu

Re: Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Carl Trieloff
Robert Greig wrote: 2009/8/31 Carl Trieloff : I would like to know if QPid can operate only on a LAN ? yes. Carl, are you actually saying you think Qpid only works in a LAN environment? It works in both LAN and WAN. thanks for picking that up. Carl.

Re: Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Robert Greig
2009/8/31 Carl Trieloff : >> I would like to know if QPid can operate only on a LAN ? >> > > yes. Carl, are you actually saying you think Qpid only works in a LAN environment? Robert - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementatio

Re: Processing then acknowledging message from broker.

2009-08-31 Thread Jason Jones
John thanks for replying. I am using the C++ QPID client library. I am using the SubscriptionManager and MessageListener classes to receive a message. So are you saying that when the method MessageListener::received() is called the message is received, but still on the queue in the broker, t

Re: Processing then acknowledging message from broker.

2009-08-31 Thread John Dennis
On 08/31/2009 12:33 PM, Jason Jones wrote: Hello, I am interested in writing a message consumer that cannot tolerate message loss. In the event that the message consumer crashes while processing a message I want the consumer to be able to restart and process the same message that it was working

Processing then acknowledging message from broker.

2009-08-31 Thread Jason Jones
Hello, I am interested in writing a message consumer that cannot tolerate message loss. In the event that the message consumer crashes while processing a message I want the consumer to be able to restart and process the same message that it was working on when it crashed. I am assuming that

Re: Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Carl Trieloff
Rodrigues, Marc wrote: Thanks Carl Do you want all clients to one location, or a federation? All the clients will be on the public network (Internet) all over the country. Then I would setup a few federated brokers if possible. See: http://qpid.apache.org/using-broker-federatio

RE: Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Rodrigues, Marc
Thanks Carl >Do you want all clients to one location, or a federation? All the clients will be on the public network (Internet) all over the country. -Original Message- From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com] Sent: lundi 31 août 2009 16:55 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject:

Re: Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Carl Trieloff
Rodrigues, Marc wrote: Hello All, I would like to know if QPid can operate only on a LAN ? yes. Does Qpid have the necessary security model for public network ? that would depend on your requirements. It does have TSL/SLL in 0.5 and on trunk we now have Kerberos encryption for most

Question about C++ broker, DotNet/Java/C++ client and WAN deployment

2009-08-31 Thread Rodrigues, Marc
Hello All, I would like to know if QPid can operate only on a LAN ? Does Qpid have the necessary security model for public network ? To use QPid across a public network, what is the recommendation ( VPN , SSH tunnels, SSL etc) ? What is your recommended approach to a WAN deployment ? Thanks ---