Dare I wonder out loud what might be involved in hooking this up?
(java
client/c++ broker combination of particular interest for us)
Its not a trivial change I'm afraid, and would require some initial
refactoring around the c++ brokers queue implementation. However in
my
opinion it would
Hi Bill,
> I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for
marshalling
> and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
> integers. I can add a custom property to the message that
> provides byte
> order, but it would be preferrable to have the byte-order of
> th
I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for marshalling
and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
integers. I can add a custom property to the message that provides byte
order, but it would be preferrable to have the byte-order of the sender
implemented in
On 09/16/2009 11:25 AM, Bill Whiting wrote:
That is exactly the case, I'm thinking of parsing fixed record format
data. If the remote system is big-endian (or just different from me)
then I want to determine how to handle the data.
Why not just write the content in network byte order?
--
John
That is exactly the case, I'm thinking of parsing fixed record format
data. If the remote system is big-endian (or just different from me)
then I want to determine how to handle the data.
//Bill
On 09/16/2009 11:03 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/16/2009 12:58 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'
On 09/16/2009 12:58 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to add
this to the API.
It's only relevant if the content is encoded using some native byte
order dependent scheme, right? Or is there some other use case you have
in mind?
On 09/1
Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to
add this to the API.
+1
Jonathan
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to add
this to the API.
//Bill
On 09/16/2009 03:21 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/15/2009 09:22 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Is there a way to get the byte order of the sending application from the
message properties?
I've looked throu
2009/9/16 Gordon Sim
> On 09/15/2009 08:39 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
>
>>
>> On 15 Sep 2009, at 13:33, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>
>> On 09/15/2009 01:13 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
>>>
Hi Gordon,
2009/9/15 Gordon Sim
I think clunky is a fair description of the current capabiliti
On 09/15/2009 08:39 PM, Andrew Wright wrote:
On 15 Sep 2009, at 13:33, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/15/2009 01:13 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
Hi Gordon,
2009/9/15 Gordon Sim
I think clunky is a fair description of the current capabilities and I
think we can improve on that.
My view of what ideal
On 09/15/2009 09:22 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Is there a way to get the byte order of the sending application from the
message properties?
I've looked throught the API and don't see anything like that.
There isn't a standard header for that (nor do any of the Qpid clients
automatically set it).
On 09/16/2009 12:15 AM, res wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having some trouble with queue auto-delete in the C# client. I have
created a queue with Option.AUTO_DELETE set, but when my client terminates
it doesn't delete the queue within the broker. Has anyone else run in to
this? Doing basically the same th
12 matches
Mail list logo
