11 out of 13 projects we use in our system in a mixed Java/Scala environment
are available via maven repos. Qpid is 1 of 2 that does not.
Speaking from the perspective of a Buildr user, having the releases 0.5, 0.6,
etc available would be a big plus.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Emma
Hi all,
I'm very new to qpid, and basically just trying to test publishing 2000
messages and consuming messages in a queue.
Using JMX console, I see that 2000 messages are in the queue, however my
consumer is always just recieving 1000 of them.
My consumer code:
Connection connection =
Le 09/07/2010 21:58, Rajith Attapattu a écrit :
Is there a chance that you could contribute the mechanism you use to
create the maven artifacts back to Qpid?
Is it based on ant Or are you using a parallel maven build :) ?
Actually it's already available for review in JIRA :)
https://issues.ap
Emmanuel,
Is there a chance that you could contribute the mechanism you use to
create the maven artifacts back to Qpid?
Is it based on ant Or are you using a parallel maven build :) ?
Rajith
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 09/07/2010 16:51, Adam Crain a écrit :
>>
>
Le 09/07/2010 16:51, Adam Crain a écrit :
Why doesn't the project release java client artifacts to a maven repo? Is there
one?
thanks, Adam
Hi Adam,
I maintain an unofficial Maven repository at this url:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/qpid/maven/
It's updated daily from the trunk.
Emman
Why doesn't the project release java client artifacts to a maven repo? Is there
one?
thanks, Adam
On 07/09/2010 08:27 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
On 9 July 2010 12:50, Bruno Matos wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:22 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
The only options would be what we have, or have an ACL policy that sets
the rate for a specific user or
group of users, (which we don't have)
On 9 July 2010 12:50, Bruno Matos wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:22 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> The only options would be what we have, or have an ACL policy that sets
>> the rate for a specific user or
>> group of users, (which we don't have). Best for Bruno to clarify
>> requirements / qu
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:22 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 09:16 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 07/08/2010 02:15 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> >> On 07/08/2010 09:10 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to control the broker's QoS for authenticated users,
> >>> li
