What is the difference between the classes in qpid/client and qpid/messaging in
C++?
I have noticed that Connection is in each. For a client application, which is
supposed to be used?
Some of the examples point to each and the documention seems to be more filled
out for the messaging/ classes.
So if messaging::Address.name maps to a queue or topic. Does the
messaging::Address.subject provide further refinement of messages sent to that
queue or topic?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:18 PM
To: users@qpid.apac
Hi David,
> I have been looking that the examples and the documentation
> for messaging::Address. I am little confused as to what
> messaging::Address.name (setName/getName) is.
>
> Is it a Session name, a URL for the broker, or something
> completely different?
Different. It's a queue or exc
I have been looking that the examples and the documentation for
messaging::Address. I am little confused as to what messaging::Address.name
(setName/getName) is.
Is it a Session name, a URL for the broker, or something completely different?
Thanks,
Dave
David Hickerson
Hi Kim,
Just to add to Rajith's comments, it sounds like you may be trying to use
the ring queue, onMessage(), queue browsing and client acknowledgements in a
way they were not designed to work.
If you have multiple clients that all need to read the same message, the
message producer should be se
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Kim Garcia wrote:
>
> Hi Rajith,
>
> It doesn't matter if the apps are consumers or queue browsers as long as
> they share the messages (or get their own copy).
>
> I'm looking into using the javax.jms Topic object as suggested, but do the
> messages have to be sen
Just to follow up on this.
I verified that if you don't ack the messages and once you close your
session, the messages are then put back on the queue with the redelivered
flag set.
So another consumer will get it.
Rajith
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> I ra
Hi Rajith,
It doesn't matter if the apps are consumers or queue browsers as long as they
share the messages (or get their own copy).
I'm looking into using the javax.jms Topic object as suggested, but do the
messages have to be sent to a topic instead of a queue? If so, then that won't
work
Hi all,
I'm having a somewhat strange error when trying to do a connect with a
producer (using the client namespace):
2011-03-09 13:37:22 error Caught exception in state: 1 with event: 2:
Operation not permitted (qpid/sys/posix/Socket.cpp:94)
This is only occurring in 1 of the producers we've cr
The answer below is assuming that all your apps are consumers and not queue
browsers.
If thats not the case then please let me know.
Rajith
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Kim,
>
> If you want all the apps (consumers) on the same queue to get all the
> messages in the
Kim,
If you want all the apps (consumers) on the same queue to get all the
messages in the queue, then using 'Queues (as in JMS terms)' is not going
to do it.
As in a shared queue situation the messages will be distributed among them.
Therefore you should use a Topic and all your consumers will
11 matches
Mail list logo
