On 04/14/2011 12:46 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/13/2011 07:36 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
Due to the points above, I would prefer to use a solution, when the
client generates an self signed certificate with the assigned username
in certificate subject and delivers the public key to me. I will check
Hi Gordon,
Thanks a lot for the help.
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
Information Technology Division
Troika Dialog, 4, Romanov lane, Moscow 125009, Russia
Phone. +7 495 2580500 ext. 1246
Gordon Sim
18.04.2011 19:52
Please respond to
users@qpid.apache.org
To
users@qpid.apache.org
cc
Sub
On 04/18/2011 04:03 PM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
Hi there,
According to the
http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.8/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch02s14.html
we can configure a client failover by means of the following snippet of
code
Connection connection("localhost:5672");
connection.s
Hi there,
According to the
http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.8/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch02s14.html
we can configure a client failover by means of the following snippet of
code
Connection connection("localhost:5672");
connection.setOption("reconnect", true);
try {
connection.open();
> Thanks Cliff.
> I think at this point of our project it would be really
> quite hard to change the messaging layer. Do you think it's
> possible to substitute the Qpid c# library with other AMQP
> 0.10 compliant libraries, like the client for RabbitMQ?
The API is probably different but, more
Thanks Cliff.
I think at this point of our project it would be really quite hard to
change the messaging layer. Do you think it's possible to substitute the
Qpid c# library with other AMQP 0.10 compliant libraries, like the client
for RabbitMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid
Improvement ticket created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3209
Best,
Jonas
-Original Message-
From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
Sent: den 15 april 2011 17:04
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Variables in ACLs
This would be a great enhancement, if you