On 08/19/2011 03:16 PM, Gregory Bayard wrote:
I can build qpid 0.10 against boost 1.46.1 fine by hacking configure to
remove the -Werror flag everywhere, but I was thinking I am probably doing
something wrong. The first warning I hit is the following:
boost_1_46_1/boost/range/has_range_iterator
Hi,
The producer flow control on queues is by default configured to 80% of
the queue size / queue count (that can be changed in the
configuration). The exception are the RING or RING-STRICT queues,
where the default values are not applied.
However, I believe that the default settings do not make
I can build qpid 0.10 against boost 1.46.1 fine by hacking configure to
remove the -Werror flag everywhere, but I was thinking I am probably doing
something wrong. The first warning I hit is the following:
boost_1_46_1/boost/range/has_range_iterator.hpp:22: error: extra ';'
Has anyone found a wa
Hi Pavel,
Unifying the options seems like a good idea. But it should be kept in
mind, that some people may have some automation build around these
tools. In our case, we have a set of shell scripts to set up the
broker environment, including creation of some exchanges, queues,
bindings etc. (If th
Hello all,
it has been noticed that qpid tools like qpid-config, qpid-cluster etc. use
different options for setting authentication stuff (username, password, sasl
mechanism). Moreover some tools don't have some options available. Plus few
tools behave wrongly in some particular cases.
I would
On 08/18/2011 07:55 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Gordon Sim wrote:
A 'link' is the logical association between a sender or receiver and
their target or source respectively. It a pathway along which messages
travel to or from some 'node'.
>
Well, yes, that's what I've read, and I understand all the w
Gordon, Fraser,
Thank you for so quick response.
-Original Message-
From: Fraser Adams [mailto:fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 3:07 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Version compatibility
I've been doing this to test a bunch of things I'm working on
Hi Gordon,
Thank you for your quick answer :)
So I will go the Python route at this time; I need the management tools.
In any case I've both bindings installed so i can cherry pick some features
if necessary I suppose.
Thanks again,
Cyril Elkaim
www.wallix.com
On 08/19/2011 11:05 AM, cyril elkaim wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to Apache QPID and I'm warming up on it. My question seems silly but
i've found two versions of the Python libs. The first one built using the
C++ bindings and the one found in /qpid/python/ and /qpid/extras/.
I understand that if I wan
I've been doing this to test a bunch of things I'm working on and I've
not had any issues, so I'd say the answer is yes.
I guess too as they both use AMQP 0.10 they ought to be fully compatible.
There are a few QMF differences between the 0.8 and 0.10 C++ broker -
the most significant one is t
On 08/19/2011 11:57 AM, Ilyushonak Barys wrote:
Greetings!
I would like to use qpid java client version 0.10 with cpp broker version 0.8.
Will it work properly?
yes
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:
Greetings!
I would like to use qpid java client version 0.10 with cpp broker version 0.8.
Will it work properly?
Regards,
Boris
___
The information contained in this message may be privileged and conf idential
and protected from disclosure.
Hello,
I'm new to Apache QPID and I'm warming up on it. My question seems silly but
i've found two versions of the Python libs. The first one built using the
C++ bindings and the one found in /qpid/python/ and /qpid/extras/.
I understand that if I want to use the Python management tools I need to
On 08/18/2011 11:33 PM, Daryoush Mehrtash wrote:
I am trying to get two qpid c++ Brokers in a federation but can't get them
to work.I am trying to get the client (python) "spout" and "drain" to be
connected on two different brokers and have a queue route between them.
Following instruction o
14 matches
Mail list logo
