Hi all,
In our application (we've tried both 0.5 and 0.12), we'd like for our
client programs to quickly recover in the case where a broker dies.
Currently, we're able to do this by dynamically allocating all our
Qpid-using code, and simply re-allocating should the broker die, but
that's see
在 2012年1月3日 下午10:52，Gordon Sim 写道：
> On 01/03/2012 02:32 PM, tkdchen wrote:
>> according to my understand to the Kerberos V5 documentation on
>> the keytab file, the default krb5.keytab exists for service and host
>> server, and it should have been discovered by GSSAPI or other API in
>> my opinio
Hi Pavel,
I'm no expert on AMQP, but my suspicion is that this relates to the fact
that the default binding (which is to the default direct exchange) isn't
a "true" binding - as far as I'm aware it is illegal for users to bind
or unbind to the default direct exchange (it's very definitely impos
On 01/03/2012 02:32 PM, tkdchen wrote:
> according to my understand to the Kerberos V5 documentation on
> the keytab file, the default krb5.keytab exists for service and host
> server, and it should have been discovered by GSSAPI or other API in
> my opinion, but it seems that doesn't work like wha
Hi,
It seems that what ever magic I was missing was bundled into using straight up
JMS API.
What they did in here:
http://www.novell.com/documentation/extend52/Docs/help/MP/jms/tutorial/durable-1.htm
helped me along. Thanks all!
--
Kalle
On Tuesday 3. January 2012 at 14.31, Kalle wrote:
在 2012年1月3日 下午7:41，Gordon Sim 写道：
> On 12/23/2011 03:57 AM, tkdchen wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm using python-qpid to integrate message bus with a django site. The
>> site must connect a QPID broker in a kerberos enviroment, so I pass
>> sasl_mechanisms='GSSAPI' to Connection to construct an ins
Pavel,
The creation of the default binding is a side-effect of creating a queue
(as is the deletion of the binding when the queue is deleted). The
event is not raised because it is implied as always occurring after the
creation of a queue.
-Ted
On 01/03/2012 05:03 AM, Pavel Moravec wrote:
forwarding wrongly targeted message to users list.
--
Kalle
Forwarded message:
> From: Kalle
> To: Gordon Sim
> Date: Tuesday 3. January 2012 14.26.38
> Subject: Re: Messaging scenarios
>
>
> Thanks for all the answers so far!
>
> Here is some of my code (edited for clarity, sorry that i
On 12/23/2011 03:57 AM, tkdchen wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using python-qpid to integrate message bus with a django site. The
site must connect a QPID broker in a kerberos enviroment, so I pass
sasl_mechanisms='GSSAPI' to Connection to construct an instance.
As the subject, I want to know when the scrip
On 12/29/2011 07:00 AM, Kalle Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing a system using QPID. I'm considering the options for
different queues, and would like some opinions and help with the issues
I have ran in to.
At the moment I'm using the C++ broker with Java clients.
1) Configuration queue
I
On 12/22/2011 01:59 PM, wolfwolfswinkel wrote:
Hi,
I am using the 0.10 c++ broker and client libraries on windows and
performing some experiments with the reconnect behaviour of the async sender
in the c++ messaging client API. Specifically, I try to enable heartbeats on
the connection, however
Hi all,
I realized that currently QMF does not raise an event when a default binding is
created (by "default binding" I mean a binding of type "{exchange:'',
queue:, key:}" that is created automatically when a queue
is created).
To check that behavior, let subscribe to
"qmf.default.topic/agent
On 01/03/2012 09:34 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
Hi Gordon,
Happy New Year to you!!
And to you! (I was on vacation when your mail was sent, hence the
delayed response btw)
I've already attached a patch to the original Jira, which I believe
covers this.
Thanks! Unfortunately Jira is down at the
Hi Gordon,
Happy New Year to you!!
I've already attached a patch to the original Jira, which I believe
covers this.
Frase
On 03/01/12 09:14, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/16/2011 05:12 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I would think that this would be necessary too wouldn't it? I took a
look at Variant& V
On 12/16/2011 05:12 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I would think that this would be necessary too wouldn't it? I took a
look at Variant& Variant::operator=(const std::string& s) and there's no
setEncoding() going on and the impl = new VariantImpl(std::string(s));
inside it looks like it uses the default
15 matches
Mail list logo
