Re: Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Sean K
>From just looking at this: ../managementgen/qmf-gen -m ./managementgen.mk -c ./managementgen.cmake -q -b -o qmf ../../specs/management-schema.xml ./qpid/acl/management-schema.xml ./qpid/cluster/management-schema.xml ./qpid/ha/management-schema.xml : No such file or directory make[1]: *** [managem

Re: Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Sean K
Oops. I was looking at an old error that I already resolved. Here is the correct error with 'make' Skipped ./qpid/framing/ClusterConnectionQueueFairshareStateBody.cpp - unchanged Skipped ./qpid/framing/ClusterConnectionQueueObserverStateBody.h - unchanged Skipped ./qpid/framing/ClusterConnecti

Re: Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Sean K
Sure.. checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64 checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) is GNU ld... yes checking wheth

Re: Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Ken Giusti
Hi Sean, Like Darryl, I do most of my qpid work using the latest Fedora. However, I was able to build the latest stable branch of qpid (0.18) successfully on my Centos 6 x86_64 machine (fully up to date). Can you cut and paste your build errors into an email? thanks, -K - Original Me

Re: Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:03:25PM -0700, Sean K wrote: > Hi > > I am looking for which linux platforms has been tested with the CPP > broker, in terms of successfully building and running. > > > cat on /etc/centos-release shows this: > Linux centos-test1 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 22

Tested Linux platforms with 0.18

2012-10-26 Thread Sean K
Hi I am looking for which linux platforms has been tested with the CPP broker, in terms of successfully building and running. cat on /etc/centos-release shows this: Linux centos-test1 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 12:19:21 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I have spent 1 hour wi

Re: C++ clients unable to communicate with Java broker

2012-10-26 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi Jeremy, OK... I think I know what the problem is now - the machine on which you built the C++ client almost certainly doesn't have the SASL libraries installed. When I build on a CentOS machine without SASL installed then I see exactly the issue you are reporting. If I install the SASL librar

Re: When Qpid 0.19 is expected to be released?

2012-10-26 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Its probably worth adding that there has just been suggestion that we slip the schedule by a couple of weeks to compensate for the amount of attention that is being directed to the Proton subproject before the upcoming ApacheCon EU in early November. Robbie On 26 October 2012 09:00, Phil Harvey w

MRG version vers QPID version

2012-10-26 Thread Jan Bares
Hi, I cannot find a page that will show me which QPID version is bundled into which MRG version. It seems that MRG 2.1 was based on QPID 0.14 but for MRG 2.2 the packages still show qpid 0.14-22, so it seems it is still based on 0.14? Thanks, Jan Jan Bareš Calypso Lead Developer In associatio

Re: When Qpid 0.19 is expected to be released?

2012-10-26 Thread Phil Harvey
Hi, Qpid uses odd-numbered versions to refer to internal in-progress work. Hence 0.19 will never be formally released. The next official Qpid version will be 0.20, due in a few weeks. Details of the 0.20 schedule are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/020-release.html Phil On 26 October 201

When Qpid 0.19 is expected to be released?

2012-10-26 Thread trivedi_ravi13
When Qpid 0.19 is expected to be released? -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/When-Qpid-0-19-is-expected-to-be-released-tp7583914.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---