Hi Gordon,
this is exactly what I wanted to get.
I tried to do it through a pointer to a Session and it just did not work:
class MySender
{
private:
Connection *pConn;
Session *pSess;
public:
MySender() {pConn = NULL; pSess = NULL;}
~MySender() { if (pConn != NULL) delete pConn;}
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:11 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 06:46 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > I think that we should minimise our use of modules and try to remove
> > those we already have - either stop building them as plugins or
> > remove them altogether.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Perso
On 06/27/2013 04:12 PM, trivedi_ravi13 wrote:
Is it possible to set uint8 value in FieldTable class?
setInt() method seem to be taking uint32_t
You can set the value to a shared_pointer to an instance of
Unsigned8Value, e.g.
ft.set("my-key", boost::shared_ptr(new Unsigned8Value(i)));
Howeve
Hi Pavel,
You are right, I just updated the client libraries to 0.22 and the
problem disappeared.
Thank you,
Regards.
On 27-06-2013 16:25, Pavel Moravec wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I think you hit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4595 that is fixed
in qpid 0.21.
Kind regards,
Pavel
-
Hi Bruno,
I think you hit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4595 that is fixed
in qpid 0.21.
Kind regards,
Pavel
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Matos"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:19:38 PM
> Subject: Receiver fetch vs get
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm
Hi,
I'm using the C++ Qpid Broker v. 0.22 and client libraries 0.20.
In the client I have a Receiver configured to listen events like
bindings and unbindings with a defined capacity of 100. If I use the
fetch method, after reading 100 messages or a little more, the following
messages never rea
Is it possible to set uint8 value in FieldTable class?
setInt() method seem to be taking uint32_t
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/C-client-API-How-to-set-uint8-value-in-FieldTable-tp7594657.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.co
On 06/27/2013 02:37 PM, Petr Parýzek wrote:
Hi,
I was try to encapsulate qpid client into this simple class
class MySender
{
private:
Connection *pConn;
public:
MySender() {pConn = NULL;}
~MySender() { if (pConn != NULL) delete pConn;}
void Send(const char *Addr, const char *M
Hi Petr,
just a guess: aren't you destroying instance of your class meantime? I.e.
having declared in a block and trying to use its Session outside the block or
so?
Can you access the instance of your class and its connection at the place when
calling Send() method for the second time?
Btw. y
Hi,
I was try to encapsulate qpid client into this simple class
class MySender
{
private:
Connection *pConn;
public:
MySender() {pConn = NULL;}
~MySender() { if (pConn != NULL) delete pConn;}
void Send(const char *Addr, const char *Msg)
{if (pConn == NULL) pConn = new Connect
On 06/27/2013 06:46 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I think that we should minimise our use of modules and try to remove
those we already have - either stop building them as plugins or
remove them altogether.
Thoughts?
Personally I'm not overly concerned whether a module is compiled in to
qpidd its
The qpid broker already does loop-suppression to prevent messages from
taking the same path more than once. The reason you get two messages is
because you have created a topology with redundant paths in it (i.e.
there are two distinct paths from each sender to each receiver). Your
receiver wi
12 matches
Mail list logo