Hi Branden,
On 15 October 2013 00:35, Branden Smith wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks for this reply as well; I restarted my broker, and now the messages
> are being received as TextMessages. It's a bit disconcerting, but I'll
> have to wait to address it when/if it comes up again, since at the mome
Hi Rob,
Thanks for this reply as well; I restarted my broker, and now the messages are
being received as TextMessages. It's a bit disconcerting, but I'll have to
wait to address it when/if it comes up again, since at the moment I can't
reproduce.
I did have one additional problem wherein the
Hi Rob,
Thank you for your reply. After enabling the logging, it looks like your
suspicions were correct; there does not appear to be any indication of the
idle-timeout on the Open frame:
Oct 14, 2013 5:21:17 PM org.apache.qpid.amqp_1_0.transport.ConnectionEndpoint
receive
FINE: RECV[(host om
Now that we've switched to cmake for the C++ build, what is the
recommended way to produce a C++ source distribution? 'make
package_source' produces a tarball that doesn't have QPID_VERSION.txt
and thus won't build.
Justin
-
To
Hi, everyone. I've started to prepare for the alpha build of 0.26,
due this week. Let me know if you have questions or comments.
Thanks!
Justin
---
0.26 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/0.26+Release
-
It was pointed out to me that sloppy wording on my part may have led to
an impression other than the one intended. At the risk of digging a
bigger hole, I'd like to try to correct that.
On 10/11/2013 12:36 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
As I said before, my interest is not in reforming OASIS. My intere
On 10/12/2013 11:40 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
a primary concern and motivation has to be standardisation,
particularly Open Standards and they must be seen to be platform
neutral - so fundamentally AMQP first and Qpid second. To me that's a
reasonable position too because, as has been expressed els
