Hi,
Which tools do you use for monitoring? I would like to use something like
Zabbix (www.zabbix.com) for QPID monitoring, should I use the command line tool
like qpid-stat to gather statistics or is there better option? And what do you
monitor? This pops out of my mind (besides log):
*
I'm currently trying to tidy up some of the message conversion code inside
the Java Broker, and wondering what the correct approach is with reply-to.
In 1.0 the reply-to address is a simple string (which may have some
structure when the OASIS Addressing spec is finalised, but until now can
really
On 03/04/2014 08:48 AM, Jan Bares wrote:
Is there any GUI based (web based) QPID management tool?
Yes, Fraser Adams built a web based console for QMF. We don't seem to
offer it in the releases yet (something we can fix soon perhaps, Justin,
Fraser?), but you can get it from trunk (or any of
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
The naive approach for a 1.0 address foo is (I guess) to look up on the
broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named foo (in which
case translate to 0-10 {exchange=foo, routing-key=}) or a queue named
foo (in which case translate to a 0-10
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
The naive approach for a 1.0 address foo is (I guess) to look up on the
broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named foo (in which
case translate to 0-10 {exchange=foo,
On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
The naive approach for a 1.0 address foo is (I guess) to look up on the
broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named foo
On 4 March 2014 14:11, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
The naive approach for a 1.0 address foo is (I guess) to look up on
the
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Rob Godfrey rob.j.godf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 March 2014 14:11, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey
I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be on a
release - so I'm a bit confused if I'm honest.
I've just checked and the first branch it's officially in is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.24/
Which is what I'd expect, not really sure what the score is with
It is included in the full source release,
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/qpid/0.26/qpid-0.26.tar.gz , it just
hasn't got its own separate archive.
Robbie
On 4 March 2014 18:19, Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be
On 03/04/2014 06:19 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be on a
release - so I'm a bit confused if I'm honest.
I've just checked and the first branch it's officially in is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.24/
Sorry, my mistake. As
It won't work.
-Steve
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:18 PM, smartdog jwjjj1...@gmail.com wrote:
We need post some messages to Azure Service Bus and figure it would be nice
(in case Azure service bus is down) to post messages to the local qpid
broker first and then let the broker propagate messages
Thanks for the reply. Would you please elaborate more as both support amqp
1.0?
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Does-broker-federation-work-with-azure-service-bus-tp7605140p7605145.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 matches
Mail list logo
