Re: Proton API layout proposal

2015-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Here's a first attempt: http://people.apache.org/~jross/proton-apidoc-draft/modules.html To summarize the delta from the current docs: - The groups are a flat array; this relates to the next point of

Re: Proton API layout proposal

2015-02-04 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: This makes good sense on its own, but it doesn't help with

Re: C++ build problem

2015-02-04 Thread Steve Huston
There's a missing file that was (should have) been added with the patch. Will check on it later. Steve Huston (sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos) On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: https://paste.apache.org/eGBG Steve, this appears to

Re: C++ build problem

2015-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
Gotcha. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote: There's a missing file that was (should have) been added with the patch. Will check on it later. Steve Huston (sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos) On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:44 PM,

Re: C++ build problem

2015-02-04 Thread Steve Huston
Thanks Justin. I will check on this tonight Steve Huston (sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos) On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: https://paste.apache.org/eGBG Steve, this appears to arise from the AIX change, 1657338. I'm on F20 in

C++ build problem

2015-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
https://paste.apache.org/eGBG Steve, this appears to arise from the AIX change, 1657338. I'm on F20 in this case, with cmake version 2.8.12.2. Justin

Re: Proton API layout proposal

2015-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
Yes, quite a lot like contrib. I think that's a fine name. If no one else objects, I'll add that to our api layout doc. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2015

Qpid Java client deadlocks

2015-02-04 Thread Helen Kwong
Hi Qpid gurus, We are using 0.16 Java broker and client on 0-10, and we are running into deadlock issues on the client that involve AMQSession's _messageDeliveryLock and AMQConnection's _failoverMutex, where different threads acquire them in different orders. This is leading to major production

Re: Qpid Java client deadlocks

2015-02-04 Thread Rob Godfrey
To answer the easy question first, 0.32 clients should be totally compatible with an 0.16 broker. In terms of the deadlock issue, I know there are a number of open deadlock JIRAs that Robbie and Rajith have looked at in the past... Hopefully one of them will be able to chip in here and discuss

Re: Fwd: 0.32 release update - Alpha is available

2015-02-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/03/2015 10:34 PM, Justin Ross wrote: On my system, Fedora 19 x86-64, I see test failures in the cpp module: https://paste.apache.org/7AWR The IPv6 tests are skipped on my system as I don't have any v6 addresses configured. The ssl tests pass however. From your output it looks like

Re: non-blocking mode in proton-c

2015-02-04 Thread Rafael Schloming
This is as expected. When you turn on non blocking mode then operations will return PN_INPROGRESS instead of blocking. Judging from a quick glance at the way your code is written, it seems like you actually want to turn blocking on and then the API will behave more as you expect it to. --Rafael

Re: Proton API layout proposal

2015-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote: This makes good sense on its own, but it doesn't help with our goal of naming and grouping together a growable library of like things. In