On 02/17/2015 09:59 PM, Michael Ivanov wrote:
Greetings,
I was creating and deleting queues using qpid c++ messenger sending the
following
messages to qpidd:
PROPERTIES: {"method"="request",
"qmf.opcode"="_method_request",
"x-amqp-0-10.app-id"="qmf2"}
Greetings,
I was creating and deleting queues using qpid c++ messenger sending the
following
messages to qpidd:
PROPERTIES: {"method"="request",
"qmf.opcode"="_method_request",
"x-amqp-0-10.app-id"="qmf2"}
DATA:
{"_object_id"={"_object_name"="org.apac
On 02/17/2015 07:37 PM, Tony Ercolano wrote:
I'm having a discussion with someone.
Using a proton messenger I set up to talk to a service.
I set up with various pn calls to do sends. I do NOTHING to set up to receive.
When I go to send my data to the service proton will:
@open
@begin
@attach (
An update.
I've made a few changes to the api layout proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Proton+API+layout+proposal
- Renamed proton.reactors to proton.reactor
- Added proton.security, to clean up the "core" space. This would be home
to future additions such as message
I'm having a discussion with someone.
Using a proton messenger I set up to talk to a service.
I set up with various pn calls to do sends. I do NOTHING to set up to receive.
When I go to send my data to the service proton will:
@open
@begin
@attach (with handle=0 role=false source=@source(40) tar
Done in svn r.1660430, QPID-6394.
Thanks for the feedback.
Kim
On 02/11/2015 01:57 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
I concur. I think it's the right time.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
This sounds reasonable enough to me. I dont think we really need a
formal vote on it thou
I have a fix for a couple of these, I'm looking into the last one now...
--Rafael
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 17:58 -0500, Alan Conway wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 16:25 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > I've posted
