Re: [proton]: docs for python reactive api

On 02/18/2015 11:33 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: I've made a start on some documentation for the reactive python api. This consists of an updated version of the tutorial that lived alongside the examples when they were in a separate branch, an

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

Thanks, approved. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/11/2015 06:40 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > >> I would like the build fix, but first some tedious questions. >> >> These functions were simply extraneous? >> > > Yes. > > Why were the present in the first instance? >> > > T

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

On 03/11/2015 06:40 PM, Justin Ross wrote: I would like the build fix, but first some tedious questions. These functions were simply extraneous? Yes. Why were the present in the first instance? They were used at an earlier point in the code, but subsequent modifications removed these uses

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

I would like the build fix, but first some tedious questions. These functions were simply extraneous? Why were the present in the first instance? On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/11/2015 02:01 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 09:21 -0400, Justin R

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

On 03/11/2015 02:01 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 09:21 -0400, Justin Ross wrote: Hi, folks. The 0.32 release candidate is now available. Release artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/0.32-rc/ Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/r

multiple AMQP DATA sections in the same transfer frame

Hello qpid.apache.org, I would like to have in a transfer frame multiple data sections with Proton. (each of these data sections is supposed to be carrying 1x binary data). How does one create in the same transfer frame multiple sections? Best Regards, Andrei P

Re: Qpid JMS 0.1.0-beta

On 03/11/2015 10:15 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote: Hi Robbie, I played with it a bit ... what I noticed is that it looks like it completely ignores the truststore which I pass to the client using the transport.trustStoreLocation option. Can it be that the org.apache.qpid.jms.transports.TransportSupport

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

Hi Justin I discovered serious one regression whilst testing 0.32. QPID-6440 effectively prevents a user managing a HA group of Java Brokers. It is a simple UI problem that results in a flag becoming set on the server side with no reasonable way

Re: 0.32 release update - RC is available

On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 09:21 -0400, Justin Ross wrote: > Hi, folks. The 0.32 release candidate is now available. > > Release artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/0.32-rc/ > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1027 > Test ou

How to let a topic receiver know that the related topic sender "has gone"?

Hi, consider the following simple setup: A topic exchange sender in c#, a c++ broker and a topic receiver in c#. sender created with: Sender _sender = session.CreateSender("test/AAA.B;{create:always, delete: always, node:{type:topic}}"); receiver created with: Receiver _feed_receiver = session.