- Original Message -
> From: "aconway"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:23:01 PM
> Subject: Re: The un-reactor
>
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 22:03 -0700, Cliff Jansen wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this exactly fits your question (especially the
> > multi-threaded
On 10/26/2015 04:23 PM, aconway wrote:
Proton is an AMQP protocol
engine it is not a general purpose IO and event handling framework. I
see the value of proton providing a simple IO framework for isolated
proton projects when there is nothing else available. But if you
already use tornado, epoll,
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 22:20 +0300, Michael Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks for the advice,
>
> I am using messenger in passive mode integrating it into select
> -driven
> event loop. Mayxbe reactor would be more appropriate, but I have
> checked
> the proton api documentation and al reactor functions are r
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 22:03 -0700, Cliff Jansen wrote:
> I'm not sure if this exactly fits your question (especially the
> multi-threaded part), but the python tornado loop examples run a
> regular reactor set of events and collectors but driven by the
> external loop.
>
> pn_iohandler is replaced
On 19 October 2015 at 15:37, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 10/17/2015 01:36 AM, Chris Richardson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm attempting to set up a broker federation topology using purely SSL
>> client authentication and the EXTERNAL SASL mechanism on qpid-cpp 0.34.
>> This seems to be within an iota of w
On 26 October 2015 at 10:44, Erik Aschenbrenner wrote:
> Ok, so sending heartbeats from the client is working automatically when the
> broker requested it.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
Yes thats correct, if the broker advertises an idle-timeout value to
the client then it will automatically send heartbea
Ok, so sending heartbeats from the client is working automatically when the
broker requested it.
Thanks,
Erik
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-JMS-Idle-timeout-inactivity-handling-tp7632838p7632840.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive
On 26 October 2015 at 10:14, Erik Aschenbrenner wrote:
> Dear Qpid-Users,
>
> I'm using the Qpid JMS (0.6.0). The provider of the service my client
> application connects to has informed me that it has changed it's message
> plattform from JBoss A-AMQ 6.1 to A-MQ 6.2:
>
> /Please note AMQ 6.2 come
Dear Qpid-Users,
I'm using the Qpid JMS (0.6.0). The provider of the service my client
application connects to has informed me that it has changed it's message
plattform from JBoss A-AMQ 6.1 to A-MQ 6.2:
/Please note AMQ 6.2 comes with an automatic heartbeat / connectivity
monitoring built in [h
