Thank you Steve!
Can you please point me out to the code which parses the log? I would like to
locally add an ignore on the SSL error to make sure I have no other failures.
Regarding the setup of the certificate, are there more specific information on
what the certificate should contain, etc?
Hello,
In the documentation of Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0, it is mentioned here that
unroutable messages will be discarded eventually.
I have a test where a queue is bound to a topic and a message is sent which
doesn't match the binding filter on purpose. Instead of the message being just
The test is failing because the test script looks through the log for errors
and flags the SSL error. It isn't perfect and should be worked on, but at this
point in time you can safely ignore that particular error.
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Adel Boutros
Hello Steve,
This is the full output given. If what you are saying is correct, then I don't
understand why the test is failing.
Do you think there is an easy way to find out? Do you need some extra
information?
Regards,Adel
> From: shus...@riverace.com
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE:
Thanks Robbie. Helped to clarify what is going on!
Which spurs question about temporary queues and when queues are deleted. That
will be another question for the discussion board!
From: Robbie Gemmell [robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 04,
There were 13 binding +1 votes received and another 2 from users, with
no other votes received. The vote has passed.
I'll chat with infra in the days ahead about how things proceed.
Robbie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The general process is typically to establish somewhere for responses
to go and start listening for them, send messages requiring response,
process responses as they arrive. Not unlike a traditional message in
an envelope. You can of course play with that order if for example you
were using either
Gordon,
So am I right in understanding that after I generate a "reply to" address I
should create a receiver so as to instantiate that queue before I send the
message populated with the "reply to" address? So the order in which a "reply
to" address is utilized 'matters'? A unique "reply to'
Hi,
I was playing with the Python binding for Proton - in particular with the
BlockingConnection.
I noticed following behavior with the BlockingReceiver:
- When I use the receiver to receive several messages without settling them
and call accept afterwards, it accepts only one message. My
I completely agree Alan. We have recently been doing something very similar
internally in C++03 and the C++11 primitives are sourly missed. We have
managed to not use std::function by having a certain number of hardcoded
events which can be sent to a connection engine and using custom
10 matches
Mail list logo
