Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-04-19 Thread rammohan ganapavarapu
Thanks Rob, it worked by adding this to bin/qpid-server startup script QPID_OPTS="$QPID_OPTS *-Dderby.stream.error.file=$DERBY_LOG/derby.log* -Damqj.read_write_pool_size=32 -DQPID_LOG_APPEND=$QPID_LOG_APPEND" Ram On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-19 Thread Timothy Bish
+1 On 04/19/2016 08:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, Short version: As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git repo, specifically "qpid-site". Further info: The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both with regard to its previous

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-19 Thread Justin Ross
Super +1 On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:03 PM > > To: users@qpid.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] move the website bits

RE: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-19 Thread Steve Huston
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:03 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo > > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 20 April 2016 at 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git > repo, specifically "qpid-site". > > Further info: > The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have,

[VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi folks, Short version: As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git repo, specifically "qpid-site". Further info: The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both with regard to its previous release content and for the additions of various new

Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-04-19 Thread Rob Godfrey
On 19 April 2016 at 22:44, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote: > Rob, > > I know you recommended to use v6 but i cant deploy it to prod right now so > can you please share how do i redirect derby.log file to specified > directory other then `pwd`? in v0.28 derby.log file is

Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-04-19 Thread rammohan ganapavarapu
Rob, I know you recommended to use v6 but i cant deploy it to prod right now so can you please share how do i redirect derby.log file to specified directory other then `pwd`? in v0.28 derby.log file is getting created from the dir where you start the processes but i wanted to send it to

Re: Proton C++ API update

2016-04-19 Thread Alan Conway
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 16:42 +0200, Alexandre Trufanow wrote: > I agree, logging events would be a good solution for this use case. > You can add this back with a re-usable class with the API as-is:  class log_handler : public proton::handler {   virtual void log_event(const std::string& name) { 

Unit testing: Use of Mock Objects- anyone doing this for their testing?

2016-04-19 Thread Flores, Paul A.
At client. Integrating QPID into existing code base. Now looking into unit testing. Considering using google mock. Is anyone else out there in same situation regarding unit testing? Any insights you'd like to share? Paul This communication

Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-19 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 09:37 -0700, Adel Boutros wrote: > ... > Checking the man of poll, a positive value of revents indicated there > are > events to read on the pipe whereas a 0 value indicates nothing to > read. This is not exactly correct. revents is a set of flag bits: If it is non zero

Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-04-19 Thread rammohan ganapavarapu
Hi Rob, I did not get chance to try v6, i will try and let you know. Ram On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > Hi Ram, > > have you got v6 working now? The memory settings for the broker depend > upon which version you are using. For version 6 there

Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-19 Thread Adel Boutros
Hello Ted, After reducing the number of threads to 1 and some debugging, we have found the problem is actually related to *pipe *and *poll *calls on Solaris/Linux. In the test, we define 2 file descriptors, one for read and one for write in *tests/server_tests.c* ufd_write = qd_user_fd(qd,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid Java 6.0.2 released

2016-04-19 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Apache Qpid Java Components 6.0.2 This release incorporates a number of defect fixes and enhancement. The release is available now from our website: http://qpid.apache.org/download.html Binaries are also

Re: java broker startup properties file

2016-04-19 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi Ram, have you got v6 working now? The memory settings for the broker depend upon which version you are using. For version 6 there is a comprehensive discussion on memory allocation settings in the manual: