After checking the help of pipe, the behavior is different between Solaris
and Linux.
On Linux, pipe returns 2 file descriptors: *one *for reading and *one *for
writing.
On Solaris, pipe returns 2 file descriptors: *both *are for reading and
writing.
So in the case of Solaris, the POLLOUT is vali
Thanks Andrew! We were also amazed at the fact it was a POLLOUT but it's not
the first time Solaris has an inexplicable behavior ...
I will try to fix the code to ignore Pollout flag and let you know if it works.
Would it interest you if i provide a patch also in case it works?
Sent from
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 08:03 -0700, Adel Boutros wrote:
> Here they are:
>
> Solaris:
> 1) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*4*, POLLIN=1
> *Test dies here*
revents=4 seems to be POLLOUT.
Since this is the read end of a pipe (if I understood correctly) I'm
not sure why POLLOUT
+1
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 01:03 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a
> Git
> repo, specifically "qpid-site".
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: u
+1
On 20 April 2016 at 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git
> repo, specifically "qpid-site".
>
> Further info:
> The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both
> with regard to it
Here they are:
Solaris:
1) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*4*, POLLIN=1
*Test dies here*
Linux:
1) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*0*, POLLIN=1
2) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*1*, POLLIN=1
3) … same as last one until end o
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:03:02 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git
> repo,
+1
Yes pleease!
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 01:03 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a
> Git
> repo, specifically "qpid-site".
>
> Further info:
> The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we h
+1
On 04/19/2016 08:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version:
As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git
repo, specifically "qpid-site".
Further info:
The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both
with regard to its previous release
seems reasonable.
+1
On 20/04/16 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version:
As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git
repo, specifically "qpid-site".
Further info:
The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both
with regard to its p
On 20/04/16 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git
repo, specifically "qpid-site".
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional comm
11 matches
Mail list logo