Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-20 Thread Adel Boutros
After checking the help of pipe, the behavior is different between Solaris and Linux. On Linux, pipe returns 2 file descriptors: *one *for reading and *one *for writing. On Solaris, pipe returns 2 file descriptors: *both *are for reading and writing. So in the case of Solaris, the POLLOUT is vali

Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-20 Thread adelboutros
Thanks Andrew! We were also amazed at the fact it was a POLLOUT but it's not the first time Solaris has an inexplicable behavior ... I will try to fix the code to ignore Pollout flag and let you know if it works. Would it interest you if i provide a patch also in case it works? Sent from

Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-20 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 08:03 -0700, Adel Boutros wrote: > Here they are: > > Solaris: > 1)  qdpn_driver_wait_3:  idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*4*, POLLIN=1 > *Test dies here* revents=4 seems to be POLLOUT. Since this is the read end of a pipe (if I understood correctly) I'm not sure why POLLOUT

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Andrew Stitcher
+1 On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 01:03 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a > Git > repo, specifically "qpid-site". - To unsubscribe, e-mail: u

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 On 20 April 2016 at 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git > repo, specifically "qpid-site". > > Further info: > The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both > with regard to it

Re: [Qpid Dispatcher] Runtime behavior on SunOS

2016-04-20 Thread Adel Boutros
Here they are: Solaris: 1) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*4*, POLLIN=1 *Test dies here* Linux: 1) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*0*, POLLIN=1 2) qdpn_driver_wait_3: idx=2, d->fds[idx].revents=*1*, POLLIN=1 3) … same as last one until end o

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Chuck Rolke
+1 - Original Message - > From: "Robbie Gemmell" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:03:02 PM > Subject: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo > > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git > repo,

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Alan Conway
+1 Yes pleease! On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 01:03 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a > Git > repo, specifically "qpid-site". > > Further info: > The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we h

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Ted Ross
+1 On 04/19/2016 08:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, Short version: As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git repo, specifically "qpid-site". Further info: The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both with regard to its previous release

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Lorenz Quack
seems reasonable. +1 On 20/04/16 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, Short version: As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git repo, specifically "qpid-site". Further info: The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both with regard to its p

Re: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo

2016-04-20 Thread Gordon Sim
On 20/04/16 01:03, Robbie Gemmell wrote: As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git repo, specifically "qpid-site". +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional comm