On 15/07/16 09:56, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 15 July 2016 at 09:16, Justin Ross wrote:
I've been working with the security pages recently, and there are two
things I propose.
First, I'd like to simplify the way we include the full CVE content.
Instead of embedding it in the CVE table as a show
Not really, as Gordon and I discussed below that they aren't wrong to
overlook the disposition frames (which the client isnt sending itself,
Proton is implicitly, and we should perhaps stop it doing so). The
reasoning for ignoring them mentioned in the comment isn't quite
correct, since disposition
Hi again,
I got some answers from Microsoft here (in the comments after the article):
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/service-bus-amqp-protocol-guide/
Looks like they have different opinion about the Disposition frames.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
w
