Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-16 Thread Ted Ross
Antoine, I think I know what that problem is. I belileve you've stumbled upon this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-496 Your second delivery, the one resulting in a timeout, is causing the inbound link to be blocked (i.e. it has undelivered messages). When the broker

Re: Qpid proton C++ supports failover url?

2016-09-16 Thread Olivier Mallassi
We may be able to use load balancer like HAProxy (level 4) But retry has to be handled; maybe proton-c provide something. On Friday, 16 September 2016, wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Does the Proton C++ API support the failover url just like JMS does? > > If no, what workarounds could I use? > > > Re

Qpid proton C++ supports failover url?

2016-09-16 Thread adelboutros
Hello, Does the Proton C++ API support the failover url just like JMS does? If no, what workarounds could I use? Regards, Adel Get Outlook for Android

Re: [QPID C++][Java JMS client] Data gets corrupted when sent to the server over SSL

2016-09-16 Thread Gordon Sim
On 16/09/16 12:39, Morgan Lindqvist wrote: Hi all, I have an issue that data gets corrupted if the size is 66068 but not if it is 65068 or smaller when using the JavaJMS client. The server is QPIC C++ and SSL encryption is used. If I instead use a Node JS based client I have no issues with the

[QPID C++][Java JMS client] Data gets corrupted when sent to the server over SSL

2016-09-16 Thread Morgan Lindqvist
Hi all, I have an issue that data gets corrupted if the size is 66068 but not if it is 65068 or smaller when using the JavaJMS client. The server is QPIC C++ and SSL encryption is used. If I instead use a Node JS based client I have no issues with the size of the messages. I have sent a 1MB large

Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-16 Thread Antoine Chevin
Hi Ted, Do you have any insights into that problem? Thanks, Antoine > Hi Ted, > > You’re right, the connection close looked strange before stopping of the broker. I manually added the annotation (# stopping the broker) and was wrong about the position of this one. I replayed the test and the con