Tnx for the claification.
Too bad the things claimed on the website aren't true, as I was
particular interested in being able to use the exact same library/API in
both Java and JavaScript (as we use both in our stack), as to not have
to deal with two separate libraries/api's that do the same
On 02/03/17 16:56, Morgan Lindqvist wrote:
Hi Matt,
Yes, but ttl does not have index 1, I do not understand this. I am missing
something.
Index 1 is priority, which should be a ubyte. Can you perhaps get a
wireshark trace? Or failing that enable trace+:Protocol on the
qpid::messaging
Hi Matt,
Yes, but ttl does not have index 1, I do not understand this. I am missing
something.
Best Regards
Morgan
Skickat från min iPhone
2 mars 2017 kl. 17:50 skrev Matt Broadstone [via Qpid]
>:
On
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Morgan Lindqvist
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using the Node JS library amqp10 (ver 3.2.5) together with quid c++
> (ver 1.35).
>
> I just started defining the TTL parameter in the header and now quid c++
> give me the following
Great!
Good luck [?]
Adel
From: Ganesh Murthy
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 4:18:54 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Qpid Dispatch - 0.7.0] Random failure on unit test
"system_tests_link_routes" on Linux
Hi Adel,
Luckily, I
On 2 March 2017 at 13:59, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> On 2 March 2017 at 13:34, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> On 2 March 2017 at 12:06, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>> > On 2 March 2017 at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell
Hi Adel,
Luckily, I was able to reproduce your problem locally. I will keep you
posted on my findings.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
> From: "Adel Boutros"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 3:11:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Qpid Dispatch -
On 2 March 2017 at 15:11, Antoine Chevin wrote:
> Thank you Rob for the very detailed answer.
> I saw in the code
> (org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.Session_1_0#remoteLinkCreation)that
> the exchange lookup is skipped if the address starts with a '/'.
> I intend to
Thank you Rob for the very detailed answer.
I saw in the code
(org.apache.qpid.server.protocol.v1_0.Session_1_0#remoteLinkCreation)that
the exchange lookup is skipped if the address starts with a '/'.
I intend to use a '/' in the beginning because I don't want the exchange
lookup.
Do you think it
On 2 March 2017 at 13:34, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 2 March 2017 at 12:06, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> > On 2 March 2017 at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 March 2017 at 18:28, Gordon Sim
On 2 March 2017 at 12:06, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> On 2 March 2017 at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> On 1 March 2017 at 18:28, Gordon Sim wrote:
>> > On 01/03/17 18:14, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The link credit is an
On 2 March 2017 at 12:56, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 1 March 2017 at 18:28, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 01/03/17 18:14, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> >>
> >> The link credit is an absolute value on the wire... but proton presents
> it
> >> in relative terms. If
On 02/03/17 10:46, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
For now, if you are looking for a Javascript AMQP 1.0 implementation
you might consider one written by Gordon Sim,
https://github.com/grs/rhea, which loosely follows the style of the
Proton Container api in the Python binding which Gordon also did much
of
On 1 March 2017 at 18:28, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 01/03/17 18:14, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>>
>> The link credit is an absolute value on the wire... but proton presents it
>> in relative terms. If you had 500 units of credit outstanding and
>> flow(-500) and then flow(2), and you get 5
On 1 March 2017 at 17:49, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 01/03/17 17:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> How did you know they had actually stopped or that it was then safe to
>> flow them new credit, just waiting for a while?
>>
>> If you flow new credit before the link is actually stopped
On 2 March 2017 at 07:56, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on http://qpid.apache.org/proton/overview.html (and
> http://qpid.apache.org/proton/), I'm looking for the JavaScript
> implementation.
>
> The only think I can find are JavaScript bindings that are cross-compiled
> from
On 2 March 2017 at 08:56, Kai Hudalla wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 18:06 +0100, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> > On 1 March 2017 at 17:53, Kai Hudalla wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:44 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > > > On 1 March 2017 at
On 2 March 2017 at 10:46, Antoine Chevin wrote:
> Thank you Rob for the answer. Yes it really helps!
> I noticed that addresses in the form / are also
> used with AMQP 1-0. Is it expected?
>
>
It is part of how the Java Broker maps the AMQP 0-x Exchange/Binding/Queue
Thank you Rob for the answer. Yes it really helps!
I noticed that addresses in the form / are also
used with AMQP 1-0. Is it expected?
Thank you,
Regards,
Antoine
On 1 March 2017 at 20:25, Olivier Mallassi
wrote:
> Rob, all
>
> Thank you rob for this. Could you
Hello,
I tried to configure addresses starting with a '/' but using qdstat I see
that this '/' is removed. Is it expected?
I noticed the same behavior with autolinks.
Thank you,
Regards,
Antoine
On 02/03/17 09:18, Morgan Lindqvist wrote:
I am using AMQP 1.0, a requirement for the implementation. Can I not use an
"exchange" and connect it to a queue and write to the exchange and read from
the queue in this case?
Yes, you can. AMQP 1.0 doesn't cover the binding of the queue to the
Hi,
I will try getting the logs, but until then.
I am using AMQP 1.0, a requirement for the implementation. Can I not use an
"exchange" and connect it to a queue and write to the exchange and read from
the queue in this case?
I have big difficulties in identifying which part of quid that is for
Hi Dan,
Yes, I think that flow sounds about right.
I haven't done it myself but that is essentially the approach I would take.
Feel free to let us know if you run into problems with the Qpid side.
Sorry, that I cannot help you more with the CF side.
Kind regards,
Lorenz
On 01/03/17 15:05,
23 matches
Mail list logo