+1
* Validated signature and checksum
* Verified License and Notice files present
* Built from source and ran self tests.
On 10/18/2017 01:29 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.18.0 release,
please test it and vote accordingly.
The source
+1
* Verified checksums
* Built debug on Fedora 25
** Self tests pass
* Included in Dispatch
** Dispatch self tests pass
* Build Visual Studio 2013 x64
** Self tests pass Debug, Release
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October
Team,
RC1 of Qpid Dispatch Router version 1.0.0 can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/dispatch/1.0.0-rc1/
Please use this for testing and evaluation. I will hold off the vote until
there has been some testing done. There have already been some minor
console issues
+1
Did the following -
Downloaded the 0.18.0 source archive and verified signatures
Compiled 0.18.0 source code
Pointed Dispatch to use the 0.18.0 version of proton and all Dispatch unit
tests executed successfully.
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
It is possible to either 'subscribe' to the exchange itself (with the
broker possibly making tempory subscription queues in the background
to facilitate it), or explicitly bind queues to exchanges (which can
be done with qpid-configs bind and unbind subcommands) and then
consume from the queues. Th
Hi folks,
I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.18.0 release,
please test it and vote accordingly.
The source archive can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.18.0-rc1/
The JIRAs currently assigned are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release
Sorry Keith but I didn't have enough time to create the Jira or provide a fix :(
From: Keith W
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 7:02:40 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Qpid Java Broker 6.1.4] Some expections are hidden
I raised this as QPID-7979.
On
I raised this as QPID-7979.
On 16 October 2017 at 12:34, Keith W wrote:
> Hi Adel
>
> Please raise a JIRA. Include a patch or pull request if you like.
> I'll try to include in v7.0.
>
> cheers Keith
>
> On 16 October 2017 at 12:06, Adel Boutros wrote:
>> No, this was the only case I hit while
Greetings,
Can somebiody point me to proper qpidd exchange configuration?
I want to use some kind of broadcast messages delivered to several subscribers
simultaneously. For this I create an fanout exchange with specific name and
make all subscribers to subscribe to this exchange name, same way as
The problem is confusion between URL and Go "connection address". Electron
lets Go do all the networking and only handles AMQP encoding/decoding, so
electron.Container.Dial() is just a shortcut for conn := net.Dial(...);
proton.Container.Connection(conn, [options...])
So the network address to Dia
Hello guys,
While testing the tableNamePrefix, we noticed a bug and a very slow performance
on Oracle Database.
I have submitted 2 jiras one for each and a pull request on the master of
qpid-broker-j.
So I was wondering if they are accepted if it is possible to backport them to
6.1 branch a
A forward-slash '/' as the username and password separator is a surprise,
because [1] and more importantly [2]
Note: The rule in the quoted Proton-C doc formally disallows any occurrence of
'/' for the password, but it doesn't enforce it [3] so base64-encoded (with
'/') strings are factually wo
12 matches
Mail list logo
