RE: Routing messages between two brokers

Wonderful - that worked great, Ted - thanks!!! > -Original Message- > From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 11:31 AM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Routing messages between two brokers > > Hi Steve, > > Setting up the addresses as

[VOTE] Release of qpid-interop-test 0.1.0

This is the first official release of the test tool qpid-interop-test. I have provided a release candidate at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/interop-test/0.1.0-rc4/ Instructions for building and installation are in QUICKSTART.md. Please test and vote. Thanks, Kim van der Riet

Re: Routing messages between two brokers

Hi Steve, Setting up the addresses as waypoints configures the router to properly route producers _to_ the broker and consumers _from_ the broker. Your case is a little different. Try this alternative configuration: autoLink { addr: to.myapp connection: appbroker dir: in phase:

Re: [Java Broker] Usage of any certificate from keystore

rgodfrey wrote > On 27 October 2017 at 10:43, Vavricka > vavricka.tomas@ > wrote: > > In the period 28.10.2017 10:00 - 30.10.2017 10:00; both certificates are > valid... the broker can't really know which is "preferred" by the client, > I > would think that we should always go with the one

Re: [Java Broker] Usage of any certificate from keystore

On 27 October 2017 at 10:43, Vavricka wrote: > I can imagine these situations where it can be helpful. > > 1. > > * There is active/passive cluster (provides a fully redundant instance of > each node, which is only brought online when its associated primary node >

Re: [Java Broker] Usage of any certificate from keystore

I can imagine these situations where it can be helpful. 1. * There is active/passive cluster (provides a fully redundant instance of each node, which is only brought online when its associated primary node fails) environment where Java broker is running on node1 * Shared drive is used for