Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

Hi Robbie And Rob, Thank you so much for details. I completely understand now, we can't do much. Thanks again. Regards, Abhishek Kumar -- Sent from: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html - To un

Re: Temporary queues deletion

Greetings, I tried setting lifetime-policy in qmf request and I do not see any difference. Then I modified messenger.c (starting from line 1768) and set 'exclusive' property there on source terminus when creating queue using '#' specifier as follows: if (pn_streq(name, "#")) { pn_data_t *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1

On 07/31/2018 12:18 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.28.1-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3

On 07/31/2018 11:00 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.27.3-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at:

Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

On 31 July 2018 at 17:35, Rob Godfrey wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 17:18, akabhishek1 > wrote: > >> Hi Rob, >> >> Thanks for your reply. I also got same comment from Robbie and Timothy. >> >> So, I raised this issue with Microsoft and they accepted this issue and >> they >> fixed issues in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1

On 31 July 2018 at 17:18, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1 release, please > test it and vote accordingly. > > The files can be grabbed from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.28.1-rc1/ > > The maven artifacts are st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3

On 31 July 2018 at 16:00, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3 release, please > test it and vote accordingly. > > The files can be grabbed from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.27.3-rc1/ > > The maven artifacts are st

Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 17:18, akabhishek1 wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for your reply. I also got same comment from Robbie and Timothy. > > So, I raised this issue with Microsoft and they accepted this issue and > they > fixed issues in their SDK which is “azure-servicebus-1.2.7”. > > I have done

Re: [Broker-J] Reject overflow policy

Olivier, Yeap, the Web Management Console needs to be changed for that. I will look into it. Kind Regards, Alex On 31 July 2018 at 15:10, VERMEULEN Olivier wrote: > Thanks Alex, I just tested it and it works like a charm. > One thing though, this attribute is not accessible through the graphica

Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

Hi Rob, Thanks for your reply. I also got same comment from Robbie and Timothy. So, I raised this issue with Microsoft and they accepted this issue and they fixed issues in their SDK which is “azure-servicebus-1.2.7”. I have done testing with “azure-servicebus-1.2.7” and getting expected er

[VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1

Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.28.1 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.28.1-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

The client's responsibility is to say "I want to send to this destination and I assert that is a queue". This is what the client does. It is up to the server side to validate the assertion that the client is making. The client has no information as to whether the server is lying or not. The er

Re: Message going in topic with the use of "session.createQueue(name)"

Hi Tim, I have created Destination dest = session.createQueue("test-resource"); I am expecting message should go in Queue and if "queue" is not available then throw exception. Current Behaviour - If "test-resource" named topic exists instead of a Queue then message is successfully delivered

[VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3

Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.27.3 release, please test it and vote accordingly. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.27.3-rc1/ The maven artifacts are staged for now at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

RE: [Broker-J] Reject overflow policy

Thanks Alex, I just tested it and it works like a charm. One thing though, this attribute is not accessible through the graphical interface... Olivier -Original Message- From: Oleksandr Rudyy Sent: mardi 31 juillet 2018 15:22 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: [Broker-J] Reject ove

Re: [Broker-J] Reject overflow policy

Hi Olivier, By default, Qpid exchanges drop unroutable/rejected messages. You can set exchange "unroutableMessageBehaviour" to "REJECT" in order to reject the unroutable/rejected messages: "unroutableMessageBehaviour" : "REJECT" Kind Regards, Alex On 31 July 2018 at 12:44, VERMEULEN Olivier w

RE: [Broker-J] Reject overflow policy

Hello, Actually I managed to reproduce my first use case where the client does not receive the exception. It happens when sending through a topic to a queue with REJECT policy enabled. The message is indeed rejected when the queue is full but the client does not receive anything... Olivier ---