Re: Can I expose Java properties set in the Qpid broker server via JMX or the REST API?

2018-12-19 Thread Brian O'Shea
Looking at jconsole (connected to the running Qpid broker), it appears that it exposes a Map under java.lang -> Runtime -> Attributes -> SystemProperties. Is this something that I can depend on always being available? This is Qpid version 7.0.6, which no longer supports management over JMX, but w

Can I expose Java properties set in the Qpid broker server via JMX or the REST API?

2018-12-19 Thread Brian O'Shea
Hello Qpid maintainers, My organization uses Qpid, and we occasionally deploy configuration changes that we track using a build number that we generate internally. We would like to find a way to expose this build number so that our application can access it to see what "build" the Qpid broker is

[VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 1.5.0 (RC1)

2018-12-19 Thread Ganesh Murthy
Hello All, Please cast your vote on this thread to release RC1 as the official Qpid Dispatch Router version 1.5.0. RC1 of Qpid Dispatch Router version 1.5.0 can be found here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/dispatch/1.5.0-rc1/ The following features, improvements, and bug

Re: [NOTICE / DISCUSS] migrating Git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I noticed just now that the GitHub PR integration behaviour had changed since the migration, with comments not being left on the JIRA for PR open/close/comments etc, but rather 10minute time-spent entries made to the Work Log instead to carry activity from the PR. I asked infra about it and theyve

[VOTE] Release Qpid Broker-J 7.1.0

2018-12-19 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Hi folks, I built release artefacts for Qpid Broker-J version 7.1.0 RC1. Please, give them a test out and vote accordingly. The source and binary archives can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/broker-j/7.1.0-rc1/ The maven artifacts are also staged for now at: https://

Re: Not able to recreate consumer after InvalidDestinationException, even tried 32K+ times to recreate

2018-12-19 Thread akabhishek1
Hi Robbie, We need one suggestion from you for handling JMS exception in better way. Pre Conditions- We have a) One javax.jms.Connection b) Registered exception listner. So we will get connection related exception on "onException" block c) 50+ javax.jms.Session d) 32+ javax.jms.MessageProducer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 0.40.0

2018-12-19 Thread Jakub Scholz
+1 ... I run the client against different versions of the C++ broker and all seems to be ok. (I used the staging repository) On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:47 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a spin for a 0.40.0 Qpid JMS client release, > please give it a test out and vot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 0.40.0

2018-12-19 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 I tested release artefacts as follows: * verified signatures and checksums * built and ran unit tests successfully from source bundle * ran successfully Qpid Broker-J system tests using staged release artefacts (mvn clean install -DskipTests -DskipITs=false -Dnetty-version=4.1.32.Final -Dqpid-j