On 5/19/21 12:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.59.0 Qpid JMS client release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.59.0-rc1/
The maven artifa
Oops. Seems I was too busy checking on my 1.0.0 testing and didn't
complete the svn commit as I thought I had. Its there now.
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 19:11, Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On 5/19/21 12:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have put together a spin for a 0.59.0 Qpid JMS cli
On 5/19/21 11:41 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 1.0.0 Qpid JMS client release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/1.0.0-rc1/
The maven artifact
On 5/19/21 12:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.59.0 Qpid JMS client release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.59.0-rc1/
This path is in
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 16:41, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a spin for a 1.0.0 Qpid JMS client release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/1.0.0-rc
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.59.0 Qpid JMS client release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.59.0-rc1/
The maven artifacts are also staged for now at:
https://repos
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 1.0.0 Qpid JMS client release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/1.0.0-rc1/
The maven artifacts are also staged for now at:
https://reposit
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 17:04, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:34 PM Namitha, Nancy wrote:
> > Is Broker - J optimized for the below mentioned scenario.
>
> I believe the java broker will indeed perform better for synchronous
> publish. Best thing is to run a quick test though.
>
B
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:34 PM Namitha, Nancy wrote:
> Is Broker - J optimized for the below mentioned scenario.
I believe the java broker will indeed perform better for synchronous
publish. Best thing is to run a quick test though.
-
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the info, that helps a lot. Is Broker - J optimized for
the below mentioned scenario.
Regards,
Nancy
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 2:10 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Message Persistenc
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 5:09 AM Namitha, Nancy wrote:
>I have deployed Qpid Broker C++ v 1.39 package on Ubuntu 18.4.
> And have enabled persistence using linearstore libraries. And I am using
> AMQP 1.0 Client Library for GO (https://github.com/Azure/go-amqp) for
> sending a
The C++ broker operates a journal flush on a timer, which defaults to
0.5 seconds. For AMQP 1.0 usage this timer is the only event that
makes the broker flush the durable messages to disk, and it doesnt
acknowledge a durable message until it has, so for synchronous sends
(as it sounds like you are
12 matches
Mail list logo