Wouldn’t make more sense to call it ProtonJ 2.0 instead of ProtonJ2 1.0?
Not voting against it. But it would be a better name IMO.
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 4:23 PM Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
> +1
>
> * verified signatures and checksums
> * built and ran tests from source bundle
> * ran HelloWorld us
+1
* verified signatures and checksums
* built and ran tests from source bundle
* ran HelloWorld using staged artefacts against Qpid Broker-J built
from main branch
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 20:28, Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a release candidate for a 1.0.0-M2 Qpid Pro
