Re: QPID Broker-J Java 11

2022-03-28 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 Please feel free to migrate Qpid Broker-J to java 11. I cannot think about any issue with an update to java 11. Kind Regards, Alex On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 07:53, Daniil Kirilyuk wrote: > > Hi Colleagues, > > > > We'd like to update the java version from 8 to 11 for QPID Broker-J. > Although J

Re: Messages consumed by Proton-C AMQP 1.0 are not dequeued from ActiveMQ broker

2022-03-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Yes, the other languages use the C protocol engine and sometimes IO bits. https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/blob/0.37.0/INSTALL.md On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 16:56, wrote: > > I see, and that makes sense. All this time we were building just C, all > bindings were disabled in cmake. > > So if we

[VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 1.6.0

2022-03-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a 1.6.0 Qpid JMS client release, please give it a test out and vote accordingly. The source and binary archives can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/1.6.0-rc1/ The maven artifacts are also staged for now at: https://reposit

RE: Messages consumed by Proton-C AMQP 1.0 are not dequeued from ActiveMQ broker

2022-03-28 Thread rafblink182
I see, and that makes sense. All this time we were building just C, all bindings were disabled in cmake. So if we build just the CPP binding, does that require the C source as well? -Original Message- From: Robbie Gemmell Sent: Monday, 28 March, 2022 8:45 AM To: users Subject: Re: Mes

Re: Messages consumed by Proton-C AMQP 1.0 are not dequeued from ActiveMQ broker

2022-03-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I dont believe it says you must do either 'pn_messenger_set_incoming_window' or 'pn_messenger_accept', it says you should do both. By not setting a window the message presumably isnt actually tracked and so the code you pointed at just returns as it cant do anything, and you dont actually set an ac