Re: Is it possible to use a pub/sub exchange but let the listener receive all messages the producer sent

Hello. does your use case not working with fanout exchange ? ++ According to the document, normally a listener of a publish/subscribe kind of exchange can only receive messages after it begins running. Is there any way to let the listeners receive all the messages ever sent by producer? Basi

Asynchronous transaction in QPID

Hello, I'm trying to find the parameter to get asynchronous transaction. For example in activemq I've the parameter syncOnTransaction="false" to get this work... Do this kind of parameted exist in Qpid C++ with BDB ??? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Asynchronou

Re: JNDI problem

done ! :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1777 Yes please file a JIRA. We could trim the names to remove any leading/trailing white spaces. Regards, Rajith On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:52 AM, ffrenchm wrote: > > Hello, > > I've another JNDI problem :) > &

QPID C++ SASL, SSL and cluster features on windows

Hello, I would like to know when the QPID C++ SASL, SSL and cluster features will be avalaible under windows plateform... By reading the INSTALL-WINDOWS file I've the impression their are not available now. Thanks for all -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/QPID-C%2B%2B-SA

Re: JNDI problem

Hello, I've another JNDI problem :) When I declare this JNDI queue : queue. = The queue "physical_queue " is created and it's impossible to remove it after I think it will be easy to correct before M5. Want a JIRA ? ++ -- View this message in context

Re: tests on exclusive queue

TEST --durable reply-dekatonshir.6565.1 auto-del excl topic-dekatonshir.6565.1 auto-del excl Then I start second JMSListener with the same JNDI configuration and I do not have any error. The TEST queue is clearly not exclusive in this case... ++ ffrenchm wrote: > So

Re: tests on exclusive queue

hat exclusive queue can be durable ! What do you think about? Thanks I just updated the trunk and there is no exception raised currently - the session is only closed : INFO [apache.qpid.client.AMQSession] Closing session: org.apache.qpid.client.amqsession_0...@df1832 ... Do you have an idea w

Re: tests on exclusive queue

I just updated the trunk and there is no exception raised currently - the session is only closed : INFO [apache.qpid.client.AMQSession] Closing session: org.apache.qpid.client.amqsession_0...@df1832 ... Do you have an idea when QPID M5 will be available ? ffrenchm wrote: > Do I need

Re: tests on exclusive queue

Do I need to raise a JIRA for this exception problem (if it's one) or is there any convolution ? Thanks ! I test again exclusive queue through JNDI. My first listener create an exclusive queue. My second listener is blocked and wait that my first listner unlock my queue. I would prefer to ge

Re: how to use qpid-tools for c++ broker

I had the same problem. To make work my qpid python tools on my ubuntu I need to make a little change in the file : [qpid_python_install]/specs/amqp.0-10-qpid-errata.xml my diff : - + It should be usable then ++ I have python installed on my machine and i did set the environment variable

Re: tests on exclusive queue

wnership of the queue is released. This is why the --exclusive switch on qpid-config would be meaningless and why exclusivity cannot be durable. -Ted ffrenchm wrote: > Hello Ted, > > my mistake comes in fact from my experience in other queuers where I can set > a durable exclusive par

Re: tests on exclusive queue

Hello Ted, my mistake comes in fact from my experience in other queuers where I can set a durable exclusive parameter. What does mean this parameter ? It's mean that in ANY case the queue will be exclusive even if the client do not open an exclusive session... Thanks QMAN I see this parameter

Re: tests on exclusive queue

ent that wants to use it. Once the session closes, the queue is available for other sessions but the exclusive attribute no longer holds unless it's re-declared. -Ted ffrenchm wrote: > Hello again, > > is there anybody who can explains me where I'm wrong on my tests or

Re: QPID federation limitations.

e destination to make the messages forward : the messages are delivered instantly in the remote broker and it's fine for me ! Thank you for your patience... ++ ffrenchm wrote: > > Using queue-routes is an interesting idea but could I create queue-routes > with direct exchange with

Re: QPID federation limitations.

Using queue-routes is an interesting idea but could I create queue-routes with direct exchange with a specified key work ? Looking at qpid-route it seems not possible... ++ Ted Ross wrote: > > Ted Ross wrote: >> ffrenchm wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'

Re: QPID federation limitations.

Ted Ross wrote: > > I thought I answered it. Create a durable route and it will be > reestablished after a broker restart. > Well I was believing it was the answer on the second one. Well I already do this but I doesn't work like I expected. I'll try to retest this feature soon. Ted Ross

Re: QPID federation limitations.

e. It raised some questions like is the FIFO ordering of the final destination queue respected with this kind of behavior if you have several broker which publish on the same remote queue at different time? Ted Ross wrote: > > Ted Ross wrote: >> ffrenchm wrote: >>> Hello, &

QPID federation limitations.

Hello, I've some questions about route configuration in QPID : Is there a way to force a dynamic route reconnection when a remote node is restarted ? (Currently I need to restart my local node and reconfigure my route) Is there a way to configure the internal routing queue durable and not auto-d

Re: tests on exclusive queue

Hello again, is there anybody who can explains me where I'm wrong on my tests or if there is any bug about it ? Thanks ffrenchm wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm going to make some tests with exclusive queue. > > I declare them exclusive thanks a patched qpi

JNDI problem

Hello, I'm trying to use JNDI with my personnal exchange. I've an exchange called network.direct (type direct and durable), a queue TEST is binded on this queue. In my JMS sender when I define my destination like this : dest = session.createQueue("direct://network.direct//TEST?routingkey='TEST'

Re: Question about deleting queue

being very readable by a reviewer. > > -Ted > > > ffrenchm wrote: >> Ok it's done ! :) >> >> >> Ted Ross wrote: >> >>> You should be able to create an account on the Jira site that gives you >>> the ability to add issues and attac

tests on exclusive queue

Hello, I'm going to make some tests with exclusive queue. I declare them exclusive thanks a patched qpid-console published https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1758 here . test 1 : -- after restart I loose my exclusive option on my queue and there is a strange behavior when I

Re: Question about deleting queue

e, you can check the box for granting license to ASF. > > Furthermore, the Apache mail servers strip attachments. > > -Ted > > ffrenchm wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I try to open a JIRA but it seems I've not enough credence to do it (I >> can >>

Re: Question about deleting queue

/qpid-config qpid-config Ted Ross wrote: > > That's a feature that is missing from qpid-config. You can raise a Jira > issue to request this feature, or better, provide a patch. It would be > very easy to add --if-empty and --if-unused options to the command. > &

Re: Question about deleting queue

o={}),) That's great :) ffrenchm wrote: > > How can I set this 'if-empty' parameters through qpid-config. Do I need to > change the python code ? > > Thanks for all Gordon > > > Gordon Sim wrote: >> >> ffrenchm wrote: >>> Hello,

Re: Question about deleting queue

How can I set this 'if-empty' parameters through qpid-config. Do I need to change the python code ? Thanks for all Gordon Gordon Sim wrote: > > ffrenchm wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I realized that you can delete a queue which contain messages. Is this a >>

Question about deleting queue

Hello, I realized that you can delete a queue which contain messages. Is this a normal behavior? From my point of view, QPID should raise an warning or error to the administrative client. What do you think about ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Question-about-dele

Question about createQueue JMS method

Hello, If I want to send message on non existing queue "Q1" without any consumer on this queue, I notice that no queue "Q1" are created. I would like to know : 1) why queue are created when creating JMS consumer and not JMS producer ? 2) where are pushed the messages sended by my sender ? Is the

Re: Question about QPID broker federation

Thanks for your answer Ted ! In fact I created the two queues becauses I was inspired by another queuer way of making federation to configure my QPID federation that's why I did this error with QPID... Now it's very clear and I must say I like the QPID/AMQP power ! Ted Ross wrote: >

Re: Question about QPID broker federation

is it not dangerous to keep message duplicates in the brokers network ? ffrenchm wrote: > > I'm trying to play with the QPID broker federation. And now I've another > question :) > > Let's begin by explaining my configuration. I've two connected brokers : > >

Re: Question about QPID broker federation

I'm trying to play with the QPID broker federation. And now I've another question :) Let's begin by explaining my configuration. I've two connected brokers : on broker A : -- the queues : Queue Name Attributes ==

Re: Question about QPID broker federation

Carl Trieloff wrote: > > ffrenchm wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know if it's possible to configure QPID to route messages >> from a broker A to a broker C through a broker B. In fact I aim to >> achieve >> this kind of topology : >>

Question about QPID broker federation

Hello, I would like to know if it's possible to configure QPID to route messages from a broker A to a broker C through a broker B. In fact I aim to achieve this kind of topology : client X (network 1) send Message to Broker C via Broker A -> broker A (network 1) send message to broker C via brok

QPID C++ benchs : localhost vs remote benches

Hello, first of all I would like to thanks everybody who help me to achieve my benches with QPID C++. I almost finished them and I plan to put in this mailing list my benches results (QPID C++ vs ActiveMQ done with JMS API) during the WE. Anyway I've another question for you :) There is a point

Re: QPid JMS client configuration

reasonable time frame or at all (and it is not bound > to do so either). > If thats the case we could experiment with setting the sync bit. > > > Regards, > > Rajith > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:43 AM, ffrenchm > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >

Re: QPid JMS client configuration

the other end. It maybe that the broker does not respond to the >> flush request in reasonable time frame or at all (and it is not bound >> to do so either). >> If thats the case we could experiment with setting the sync bit. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> R

Re: QPid JMS client configuration

Is there anybody who can explains me from where comes this exception (org.apache.qpid.transport.SessionException: timed out waiting for completion) and how to avoid it ? I'm currently blocked on my bench and my study is coming now to its dead line. Thanks ... ffrenchm wrote: >

Re: QPid JMS client configuration

... Did I miss something? Is there a way to tune my JMS client to enable the flow control ? Thanks ! :) ffrenchm wrote: > > Hello, > > some new questions for you guys :) For my bench I want to send message > with different size. I'm currently testing the send of 262

QPid JMS client configuration

Hello, some new questions for you guys :) For my bench I want to send message with different size. I'm currently testing the send of 262144 bytes messages. Unfortunately I get this error : org.apache.qpid.transport.SessionException: timed out waiting for completion at org.apache.qpid.tra

Re: Python and location of spec files (was Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store)

with your patch I can make work the hello_world successfully :) Gordon Sim wrote: > > ffrenchm wrote: >> I tested the packaged python client >> (http://www.apache.org/dist/qpid/M4/qpid-python-M4.tar.gz) and I've the >> same >> problem (see bellow). Is the

Re: Python and location of spec files (was Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store)

I have the same ... [mffre...@dekatonshir:~/work/QUEUERS/QPID/qpid-M4]%grep version /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_xmlplus/__init__.py version_info = (0,8,4) __version__ = "0.8.4" Gordon Sim wrote: > > Gordon Sim wrote: >> I'm guessing the version of your xml processing libraries is differe

Re: Python and location of spec files (was Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store)

hon2.5/urllib2.py", line 244, in get_type raise ValueError, "unknown url type: %s" % self.__original ValueError: unknown url type: /home/mffrench/work/QUEUERS/QPID/qpid-M4/specs/amqp.0-10.dtd ffrenchm wrote: > > hello, > > I already checkouted the specs folder under

Re: Python and location of spec files (was Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store)

-- 1 mffrench mffrench287 2009-02-17 18:18 NOTICE drwxr-xr-x 6 mffrench mffrench 4096 2009-02-23 13:16 .svn ++ Gordon Sim wrote: > > ffrenchm wrote: >> raise ValueError, "unknown url type: %s" % self.__original >> ValueError: unknown url type: >>

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

le "/usr/lib/python2.5/urllib2.py", line 244, in get_type raise ValueError, "unknown url type: %s" % self.__original ValueError: unknown url type: /home/mffrench/work/QUEUERS/QPID/trunk/qpid/specs/amqp.0-10.dtd I'm working on Ubuntu 7.10 system. Do you have any id

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

Is there any way to force the flow-to-disk option for all messages which are putted in this queue ? ++ ffrenchm wrote: > > > > Kim van der Riet wrote: >> >> >> This store is only asynchronous. Although BDB is still used, it is no >> longer on the me

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

g and > allows another message to be sent. Errors or handled async. sync session > blocks on the call. > > The sync / flush commands can be used to control this yourself if you want > > This type of thing can be done from any client, which client do you care > about? > Ca

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

Ok I understand your answer, but it raise me another question :) Is there a way to have a really asynchronous client/server communication when putting messages ? I mean the client send a message and then the server ack the client without waiting that the message is on the disk ? Thanks ... Carl

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

Kim van der Riet wrote: > > > This store is only asynchronous. Although BDB is still used, it is no > longer on the message path for normal usage patterns - ie no message > data is stored in BDB. However, BDB will be used if flow-to-disk is > triggered, either because the messages are too larg

Re: QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

Gordon Sim wrote: > > ffrenchm wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> I'm currently using successfully QPid C++ Broker and BDB as message >> store. I >> checkouted the qpid BDB module here : >> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/rhmessaging/store/trunk/cpp/

QPID C++ Broker + persistent store

Hello again, I'm currently using successfully QPid C++ Broker and BDB as message store. I checkouted the qpid BDB module here : http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/rhmessaging/store/trunk/cpp/ I've two questions : 1) I would like to know how I can disable the debug trace when I use the BDB persisen

Re: QPID Java broker + Persistant store

I now remember that Aidan Skinner-2 told me that QPid Java Broker is now using Apache Derby as persistant message store. I think it means that Berkeley DB with QPid Java Broker is now deprecated, isn't it ? ++ ffrenchm wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to make work Q

QPID Java broker + Persistant store

Hello, I'm trying to make work QPid Java broker (trunk source) with bdb store as described here: http://qpid.apache.org/3rd-party-libraries.html So I getted the java Berkeley Database (3.3.75) and the QPid bridge module here : http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/je

Re: Some blocking problem on using QPid on my project

Aidan Skinner-2 wrote: > > There's no federation implementation for Qpid/Java AFAIK. > Thanks for your answer. I had the same impression. And is there any planned federation implementation for Qpid/Java in the QPid roadmap AFAYK ? -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/So

Re: Some blocking problem on using QPid on my project

Gordon Sim wrote: > > Only if you were redistributing the store plugin as part of some bigger > system might > there be an issue. > This is the question. I'm totally agree with the fact that I could not deliver any BDB libraries without publishing my source code - unfortunately I can't :). Bu

RE: QPid C++ broker & portability

> I have these types of machines available if you decide to pursue this > effort and want help porting it. > Would be happy to help you. I'm currently subscribing to the dev list so then we will have some discussions in it :) -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/QPid-C%2B

Re: Some blocking problem on using QPid on my project

About my BDB problem, the question is : if I use QPid with BDB in my applications do I need to publish my source code or only the QPid source code ? Where the license scopes ending ? Thanks for all ffrenchm wrote: > > Hello, > > I'll just discover the BDB license - GPL lik

Some blocking problem on using QPid on my project

Hello, I'll just discover the BDB license - GPL like (tell me if I'm false) - which is for me a blocking problem to use QPid (Java or C++ broker). I need a non GPL like persistence solution. Is there any other solutions in the pipe ? If not could you tell me the workload estimate to implement our

Access management with QPid

Hello, I'm looking now to your access management system thanks ACL. As I understand the access management is done in the QPid broker. I would like to know if it's possible to move this access management from the broker to another ACL access management tool which aims to centralize the IAM configu

Re: c++ broker build for ubuntu?

Hello, the C++ broker is compiling on ubuntu 7.10 (I should upgrade it in fact) and I've the same problem with ubuntu 8.10. The problem comes in fact from you g++ version. On ubuntu 7.10 we're using g++ 4.1 by default and on ubuntu 8.10 we're using g++4.3. So you should relink you /usr/bin/g++ (w

QPid C++ broker & portability

Hello, I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some bench)marks and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID Java broker), the results are very good. I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've some blocking points. The first one is the portability on