On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 09:55 +0200, Mark Banner wrote:
> I completely agree Alan. We have recently been doing something very
> similar
> internally in C++03 and the C++11 primitives are sourly missed. We
> have
> managed to not use std::function by having a certain number of
> hardcoded
> events whi
I completely agree Alan. We have recently been doing something very similar
internally in C++03 and the C++11 primitives are sourly missed. We have
managed to not use std::function by having a certain number of hardcoded
events which can be sent to a connection engine and using custom
promises/futu
I am working on a multi-threaded broker example for proton C++ and I am
becoming more and more convinced that it doesn't make much sense to try
to do this without C++11.
There are two classes of issue:
API:
- inject() needs a way to represent a callback function. Without
std::function this is ver
