rom: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 6:42:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
>
> I gave the router a try out, building against Proton 0.17.0. The build
> completed fine, all tests passed, an
- Original Message -
> From: "Ted Ross"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:15:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
>
> Just for the record... I'm waiting for the Adel/Ganesh issues to shake
> ou
n for analyzing?
Regards,
Adel
From: Ganesh Murthy
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:48:07 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
Hi Adel,
I sent out an email to you before I saw our own Travis build indicated tha
. This PR passes on Travis as well as seen here -
https://travis-ci.org/apache/qpid-dispatch/builds/218223226
Thanks.
- Original Message -
> From: "Adel Boutros"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 12:57:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8
seen here -
https://travis-ci.org/apache/qpid-dispatch/builds/218223226
Thanks.
- Original Message -
> From: "Adel Boutros"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 12:57:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
>
>
I gave the router a try out, building against Proton 0.17.0. The build
completed fine, all tests passed, and I ran the Qpid JMS HelloWorld
against the built router.
The signature and checksums verified fine, though the .sha512 checksum
file should be renamed with .sha extension for consistency wit
: Monday, April 3, 2017 6:02:31 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
Hi Adel,
I believe this pull request -
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/157 - must fix the test failures
you are seeing on RHEL 6.4. Can you please try applying it
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-738
I am not sure we can get to them before the 0.8.0 release.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
> From: "Adel Boutros"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 3:55:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8
Small correction:
We are using Proton 0.16.0 with only C++ and Python bindings activated.
From: Adel Boutros
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 9:55:32 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
Hello Ganesh,
Please
- Original Message -
> From: "Adel Boutros"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:04:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
>
> I rechecked quickly and I have different behaviors on different OSes.
h 30, 2017 2:48:10 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
Adel,
The commits associated with that Jira and PR #140 are included in this
release candidate. We'll need to investigate whether it regressed again
or if the commit didn't fix the
\\'\'\'.'
19: error: [Errno 97] Address family not supported by protocol
Regards,
Adel
From: Ted Ross
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 1:32:42 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1
The first
:1\\\' did not resolve to
one of the supported address family"\\\'\'\'.'
19: error: [Errno 97] Address family not supported by protocol
Regards,
Adel
From: Ted Ross
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 1:32:42 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Qpid Dispatch
The first release candidate for Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 is ready for
evaluation.
Build Artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/dispatch/0.8.0-rc1/
New Features:
DISPATCH-103 - Websocket Listeners
DISPATCH-195 - Add support for transactional messages in the Router
14 matches
Mail list logo
