users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Proton-c 0.9.1 and Qpid 0.32 Java Broker
On 05/19/2015 10:35 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> Probably not you but some issue with the "does this name map to the
> interface the port is bound to" logic... what version of Linux are you
&g
On 05/19/2015 10:35 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Probably not you but some issue with the "does this name map to the
interface the port is bound to" logic... what version of Linux are you
running? I'll try to replicate.
I tried with 127.0.0.1 and the (unqualified) hostname, both gave the
same not-f
Probably not you but some issue with the "does this name map to the
interface the port is bound to" logic... what version of Linux are you
running? I'll try to replicate.
-- Rob
On 19 May 2015 at 11:28, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 05/19/2015 10:19 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>>
>> Gordon: I'm a bit surpr
On 05/19/2015 10:19 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Gordon: I'm a bit surprised if you needed to create a new virtual host
... from 0.32 onwards the Java Broker supports the notion of aliases
for virtual hosts... on type of alias is the "hostnameAlias" which
when used on a port (as it is by default) will
Gordon: I'm a bit surprised if you needed to create a new virtual host
... from 0.32 onwards the Java Broker supports the notion of aliases
for virtual hosts... on type of alias is the "hostnameAlias" which
when used on a port (as it is by default) will map the connection to
the default virtual hos
On 05/19/2015 12:06 AM, Carlos Lugtu wrote:
Thanks for the response. Can you send me your configuration? Config.json
Attached.
I'd like to make sure I'm adding the virtual hosts correctly.
I'm not 100% sure I did things correctly - I just used the web gui - I
have no real expertise on conf
duce this on Windows?
Thanks,
C
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:14 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Proton-c 0.9.1 and Qpid 0.32 Java Broker
On 05/18/2015 04:46 PM, Carlos Lugtu wrote:
> .\send.exe -a amqp://an
apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Proton-c 0.9.1 and Qpid 0.32 Java Broker
Is it possible you to turn on frame debug logging in the Java Broker...
Adding something like the following:
to the log4j.xml for the broker should do it.
I'm guessing that proton is trying
On 05/18/2015 04:46 PM, Carlos Lugtu wrote:
.\send.exe -a amqp://anonymous:@localhost:5672 hello
Use amqp://anonymous@localhost:5672, with that I see a successful
anonymous authentication (if that is not a contradiction in terms) from
messenger 0.9.1 to java broker 0.32. (With the extra colon
imple test?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:01 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with Proton-c 0.9.1 and Qpid 0.32 Java B
al Message-
From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:01 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Proton-c 0.9.1 and Qpid 0.32 Java Broker
OK - so for Carlos, if he wants to use anonymous with proton 0.9.1 he could use
amqp://anonymous:@loca
OK - so for Carlos, if he wants to use anonymous with proton 0.9.1 he could use
amqp://anonymous:@localhost:5672
(where anonymous could actually be substituted by any non-zero length string)
-- Rob
On 18 May 2015 at 11:56, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 05/18/2015 10:19 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>>
>> Do
On 05/18/2015 10:19 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Does the proton client support Anonymous SASL, or would Carlos need to
set up some user/password database on the server side (i.e. is
supplying a user/password just to force the client into doing SASL
negotiation)?
Sorry, I guess I didn't actually answ
Does the proton client support Anonymous SASL, or would Carlos need to
set up some user/password database on the server side (i.e. is
supplying a user/password just to force the client into doing SASL
negotiation)?
-- Rob
On 18 May 2015 at 10:53, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 05/17/2015 11:01 PM, Rob G
On 05/17/2015 11:01 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
Hi Carlos,
at a guess the proton client is trying to communicate without creating
a SASL authentication layer.
AMQP 1.0 allows establishment without establishing any authentication
layer - distinct from requiring an authentication layer but allowing
th
Hi Carlos,
at a guess the proton client is trying to communicate without creating
a SASL authentication layer.
AMQP 1.0 allows establishment without establishing any authentication
layer - distinct from requiring an authentication layer but allowing
the ANONYMOUS mechanism.
The Java Broker does
16 matches
Mail list logo
