up till qpid-0.16
There is no built in support for load balancing yet?
the only way to achieve the third point Zhemzhitsky Sergey mentioned in
previous post is to setup a load balancer server? could anyone give some
hint how to setup a balancer server ? i totally newbie in this area.
thanks in a
Hello Gordon,
Your information is very useful. Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Irving [mailto:gordon.irv...@sophos.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:12 AM
To: 'users@qpid.apache.org'
Subject: RE: QPID Cluste
Message-
> From: Zhemzhitsky Sergey [mailto:sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru]
> Sent: 29 September 2011 01:17
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: QPID Cluster and load balancing
>
> Hello Gordon,
>
> Thanks a lot for the information. I suppose we will try to use a l
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:49 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: QPID Cluster and load balancing
On 09/28/2011 12:09 PM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> I understand that all the events are synchronized between all nodes of the
> cluster.
> W
6:29 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: QPID Cluster and load balancing
Hi,
I had almost the same problem.
For this situation I put a hw load-balancer in front of 2 qpid servers, using
RoundRobin algorithm. So, the clients could connect to that VIP and the
messages was distributed to 2
On 09/28/2011 12:09 PM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
Hi Jakub,
I understand that all the events are synchronized between all nodes of the
cluster.
What I'd like to understand is:
1. Whether it is possible to distribute the connections between the nodes of
the cluster transparently for the client
; Best Regards,
> Sergey Zhemzhitsky
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Scholz [mailto:ja...@scholz.cz]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: QPID Cluster and load balancing
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> From what I un
-node cluster where the first node has 100 connections and the second
node has no connections at all?
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Scholz [mailto:ja...@scholz.cz]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 12:43 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: QPID Cl
Hi Sergey,
>From what I understood, the OpenAIS / Corosync layer used for
clustering in Qpid is anyway synchronizing the events between all
nodes. So the load should be almost the same, or? You may get some
overhead on one node from handling the connections, but is it so
significant?
Regards
Jaku
1. Is it possible to monitor the journal file size growth and flush the
journal files before it reach certain limit, so that we can save the brocker
going down.
2. Is there any limit on journal file size
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid-users.2158936.n2.nabble.com/qpid-clust
Hi
Yes this is running on separate virtual machines. Both are VMWare instances
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid-users.2158936.n2.nabble.com/qpid-cluster-one-node-crashed-tp6409726p6411155.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Also add this info to your JIRA: Are you running these on two separate
systems, or both on the same system? Are you using VMs (VMware, kvm, etc)?
Alan Conway wrote:
baOn 05/27/2011 12:43 AM, sujith wrote:
Hi
Please help me. I have configured qpid(version .10) in 2 node
cluster using
openai
baOn 05/27/2011 12:43 AM, sujith wrote:
Hi
Please help me. I have configured qpid(version .10) in 2 node cluster using
openais. When I started to send message one node always get down after few
hours or some times after a day.
This is the log when qpidd went down
...
2011-05-26 21:08:44 crit
Hi
Both servers using same configuration and same version. It has worked
without any issue nearly 10 hours.
Openais version is also same. One thing I noticed is server load was very
high during writing messages
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid-users.2158936.n2.nabble.com/qpid
Hi,
Are both brokers of the same version? See these logs:
2011-05-26 21:08:44 critical Error decoding events, may indicate a broker
version mismatch: St9bad_alloc
2011-05-26 21:08:44 notice cluster(192.168.6.202:22293 LEFT) leaving cluster
MYCLUSTER
Kind regards,
Pavel
- Original Message --
Hi
Thank you for the quck response. i dont find anything useful in
/var/log/messages
-
May 26 23:00:41 globus3 lt-qpidd[22293]: 2011-05-26 23:00:41 warning
LinkRegistry task late 1 times by 37202ms on average.
May 26 23:00:41 glob
Hi
Could you please post /var/log/messages around 2011-05-26 23:39:44 - 2011-05-27
00:10:36 ?
The qpid log looks ok for me.
Regards,
Boris
-Original Message-
From: sujith [mailto:suji...@perfomix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 8:44 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: qpid cluster on
Thanks a lot for help.
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
Alan Conway
09.02.2011 17:40
Please respond to
users@qpid.apache.org
To
users@qpid.apache.org
cc
sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru
Subject
Re: Qpid: cluster-durable queues
On 02/08/2011 01:47 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote
On 02/08/2011 01:47 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
Carl, thanks a lot.
Could you provide me with links to read more about cman and quorum
manager?
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Cluster_Suite_Overview/s1-hasci-overview-CSO.html#s2-clumembership-overv
Carl, thanks a lot.
Could you provide me with links to read more about cman and quorum
manager?
Best Regards,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
Carl Trieloff
07.02.2011 16:56
Please respond to
users@qpid.apache.org
To
users@qpid.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Qpid: cluster-durable queues
yes, that
users@qpid.apache.org
To
users@qpid.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Qpid: cluster-durable queues
On 02/03/2011 02:40 PM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
I want my queue to become durable when only one node in the cluster
stands
alive. I believe this is what the --cluster-durable option is
,
Sergey Zhemzhitsky
Gordon Sim
04.02.2011 19:47
Please respond to
users@qpid.apache.org
To
users@qpid.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Qpid: cluster-durable queues
On 02/03/2011 02:40 PM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
> I want my queue to become durable when only one node in the clus
On 02/03/2011 02:40 PM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
I want my queue to become durable when only one node in the cluster stands
alive. I believe this is what the --cluster-durable option is for.
The --cluster-durable option only works for durable queues. Its function
is to make any tran
Subject
Re: Qpid: cluster-durable queues
On 02/03/2011 08:35 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using qpid 0.8 and I'd like to use cluster durable queues.
>
> Here is my test case:
>
> 1. Start a cluster that contains two nodes.
> 2.
On 02/03/2011 08:35 AM, sergey_zhemzhit...@troika.ru wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using qpid 0.8 and I'd like to use cluster durable queues.
Here is my test case:
1. Start a cluster that contains two nodes.
2. Create cluster durable queue: qpid-config add queue MyQueue
--cluster-durable
3. Kill one no
Hi,
The cluster feature is a plug-in - if the plugin isn't loaded, the
options won't be available. Depending on you how installed Qpid, the
plugin may in the same directory as qpidd or it may be nearby. You're
looking for cluster.so I believe. Use the --load-module option (that one
is in the help
On 12/17/2009 08:55 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
I've attached my driver code to the JIRA. Feel free to contact me with any
questions you might have.
Thanks a lot Sandy, I will be looking into this as soon as I finish up my
current task.
--
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 02:37 AM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Alan. I made a new build from trunk and things are going well so
>> far, except that when I enable auth=yes, I get the following:
>>
>> 2009-12-16 18:33:18 error qpid/amqp_0_10/SessionHand
I've attached my driver code to the JIRA. Feel free to contact me with any
questions you might have.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
tapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
> Sandy thx, I am very eager to see the code.
> And if I understand in your case the cluster membership remains the
> same until th
16, 2009 6:52 AM
>> To: users@qpid.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>>
>> On 12/15/2009 01:53 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
>>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:52 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
> On 12/15/2009 01:53 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> >&
On 12/17/2009 02:37 AM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
Thanks Alan. I made a new build from trunk and things are going well so far,
except that when I enable auth=yes, I get the following:
2009-12-16 18:33:18 error qpid/amqp_0_10/SessionHandler.cpp:97: Execution
exception: unauthorized-access: authorised
sday, December 16, 2009 6:52 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
> On 12/15/2009 01:53 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> >>
> >&
On 12/15/2009 01:53 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
There is another issue that turned up with the same symptom
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-225. Fixed in r74. Let
me know if
that resolves your problem, if not I
Message-
>> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:29 PM
>> To: users@qpid.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>>
>> Sandy,
>>
>> Interesting test case.
>> I reproduced a similar is
that this was a synonym for sycn_ack. I'll do some testing on that.
Thanks,
Sandy
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:29 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
&g
Sandy,
Interesting test case.
I reproduced a similar issue (well atleast the symptoms were the same)
but apparently it looks like it's different from your issue.
Could you please open a JIRA and submit your test code?
I want to see how your test case is different from the one I have.
I was able to
Sandy Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:49 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
Sandy,
Sorry to ask the basic questions, but are you uptodate on AIS, or if
you
let us know
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:49 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
> Sandy,
>
> Sorry to ask the basic questions, but are you uptodate on AIS
Sandy Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
There is another issue that turned up with the same symptom
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-225. Fixed in r74. Let
me know if
that resolves your problem, if not I want to look into it more.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> >
> > There is another issue that turned up with the same symptom
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-225. Fixed in r74. Let
> > me know if
> > that resolves your problem, if not I want to look into it
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
>
> There is another issue that turned up with the same symptom
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-225. Fixed in r74. Let
> me know if
> that resolves your problem, if not I want to look into it more.
Tha
On 12/08/2009 02:26 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:52 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
I think this is an instance of one of the following two bugs, probably
the
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Conway [mailto:acon...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:52 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid Cluster Errors
>
> I think this is an instance of one of the following two bugs, probably
> the fir
On 11/17/2009 08:33 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
I managed to capture a log today while trace was on. Broker1 and broker2 are
in a cluster, and broker1 is pulling messages from federated_broker1 when the
error occurred:
2009-nov-17 17:22:29 debug DeliveryRecord::setEnded() id=840
2009-nov-17 17:22:
On 11/18/2009 05:08 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
On 11/17/2009 08:33 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
I managed to capture a log today while trace was on. Broker1 and
broker2 are in a cluster, and broker1 is pulling messages from
federated_broker1 when the error occurred:
Can you send me the rpm -q qpidd o
> On 11/17/2009 08:33 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
> > I managed to capture a log today while trace was on. Broker1 and
> broker2 are in a cluster, and broker1 is pulling messages from
> federated_broker1 when the error occurred:
> >
> Can you send me the rpm -q qpidd output so I can verify the version,
On 11/17/2009 08:33 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
I managed to capture a log today while trace was on. Broker1 and broker2 are
in a cluster, and broker1 is pulling messages from federated_broker1 when the
error occurred:
Can you send me the rpm -q qpidd output so I can verify the version, or if you
I managed to capture a log today while trace was on. Broker1 and broker2 are
in a cluster, and broker1 is pulling messages from federated_broker1 when the
error occurred:
2009-nov-17 17:22:29 debug DeliveryRecord::setEnded() id=840
2009-nov-17 17:22:29 debug Accepted 840
2009-nov-17 17:22:29 de
> Sandy Pratt wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2009 07:26 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> I've been working with a Qpid of two machines recently. It's
> working
> >>>
> >> well for the most part, but I've been experiencing a few sporadic
> >> failures. I've collected logs for them ov
Sandy Pratt wrote:
On 11/16/2009 07:26 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
Hello all,
I've been working with a Qpid of two machines recently. It's working
well for the most part, but I've been experiencing a few sporadic
failures. I've collected logs for them over time, and I was wondering
if
> On 11/16/2009 07:26 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've been working with a Qpid of two machines recently. It's working
> well for the most part, but I've been experiencing a few sporadic
> failures. I've collected logs for them over time, and I was wondering
> if anyone else had
On 11/16/2009 07:26 PM, Sandy Pratt wrote:
Hello all,
I've been working with a Qpid of two machines recently. It's working well for
the most part, but I've been experiencing a few sporadic failures. I've
collected logs for them over time, and I was wondering if anyone else had seen
anything
54 matches
Mail list logo
