g the WCF and DOTNET status.
-Chuck
- "Adam Crain" wrote:
> From: "Adam Crain"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:13:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: different versions of .NET clients
>
> Hi Ste
Sorry, should have been more specific...
> Thanks for the reply. I just looked at your RC directory and
> downloaded:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/RC3/qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.8.zip
>
> Is the file you intended for me to examine? I only see binary
> artifacts here.
No - that's the
Hi Adam,
Adding to Steve's comments, the WCF implementation in
qpid/0.6/qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.6.zip is a simple wrapper suitable for
Windows to Windows client use only and lacks the underpinning
architecture to do distraibuted transactions at all or local
trasactions outside the channel model program
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the reply. I just looked at your RC directory and downloaded:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.8/RC3/qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.8.zip
Is the file you intended for me to examine? I only see binary artifacts
here.
-Adam
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Adam,
> There appear to be two different .NET clients available:
>
> 1) http://apache.cyberuse.com//qpid/0.6/qpid-wcf-0.6.zip
>
> 2) http://apache.cyberuse.com//qpid/0.6/qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.6.zip
>
> 1) appears to be a .NET/WCF wrapper around the C++ client (is
> this correct?). I have gotte
