On 09/17/2009 07:48 AM, Bill Whiting wrote:
On 09/17/2009 03:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/16/2009 07:34 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for marshalling
and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
integers. I can add a custom p
On 09/17/2009 03:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/16/2009 07:34 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for marshalling
and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
integers. I can add a custom property to the message that provides byte
or
On 09/16/2009 07:34 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for marshalling
and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
integers. I can add a custom property to the message that provides byte
order, but it would be preferrable to have th
Hi Bill,
> I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for
marshalling
> and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
> integers. I can add a custom property to the message that
> provides byte
> order, but it would be preferrable to have the byte-order of
> th
I'm replacing other messaging with qpid. I have code for marshalling
and demarshalling data that uses byte-order to know how to handle
integers. I can add a custom property to the message that provides byte
order, but it would be preferrable to have the byte-order of the sender
implemented in
On 09/16/2009 11:25 AM, Bill Whiting wrote:
That is exactly the case, I'm thinking of parsing fixed record format
data. If the remote system is big-endian (or just different from me)
then I want to determine how to handle the data.
Why not just write the content in network byte order?
--
John
That is exactly the case, I'm thinking of parsing fixed record format
data. If the remote system is big-endian (or just different from me)
then I want to determine how to handle the data.
//Bill
On 09/16/2009 11:03 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/16/2009 12:58 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'
On 09/16/2009 12:58 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to add
this to the API.
It's only relevant if the content is encoded using some native byte
order dependent scheme, right? Or is there some other use case you have
in mind?
On 09/1
Bill Whiting wrote:
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to
add this to the API.
+1
Jonathan
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto
Thanks, I'll add my own attribute for now. It would be beneficial to add
this to the API.
//Bill
On 09/16/2009 03:21 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/15/2009 09:22 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Is there a way to get the byte order of the sending application from the
message properties?
I've looked throu
On 09/15/2009 09:22 PM, Bill Whiting wrote:
Is there a way to get the byte order of the sending application from the
message properties?
I've looked throught the API and don't see anything like that.
There isn't a standard header for that (nor do any of the Qpid clients
automatically set it).
11 matches
Mail list logo