On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Jon Watte wrote:
>>
>> If you are concerned about deliberately mis-behaved clients then
>> authentication is the way to go.
>
>
> I don't understand why. Authentication just means that someone is who they
> say they are. It doesn't mean that the "someone" is guara
>
> If you are concerned about deliberately mis-behaved clients then
> authentication is the way to go.
I don't understand why. Authentication just means that someone is who they
say they are. It doesn't mean that the "someone" is guaranteed to not
mis-behave. Note that when I say "client," I mea
On 01/16/2010 05:19 PM, Jon Watte wrote:
In the case of dynamically adding and removing exchanges, doesn't this mean
that there is a race condition between an exchange being removed, and all
clients knowing about it?
Yes. If you remove an exchange that clients may be using without any
coordina
In the case of dynamically adding and removing exchanges, doesn't this mean
that there is a race condition between an exchange being removed, and all
clients knowing about it?
If you required all clients to have to acknowledge an exchanged-removed
message on some other queue before you could actual
On 01/12/2010 03:47 AM, Jason Jones wrote:
I have a question about sending messages. I found that if I attempt to
send a message to a non-existent exchange from a session the session
throws an exception and I am then unable to send any other messages
through the same session, even if I am sendin
I have a question about sending messages. I found that if I attempt to
send a message to a non-existent exchange from a session the session
throws an exception and I am then unable to send any other messages
through the same session, even if I am sending to another exchange that
does exist. W
