On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:34:39PM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:38 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
Folks,
I'm incredibly pleased with rackunit, having just used it on a funky
piece of parsing code,
On May 17, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
I didn't need the case or suite functionality yet.
You did. That's what your long post says, but you probably didn't realize it.
-- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
While we're at it: any chance of getting a test-on-entry-point for Rackunit as
I described a while ago is available in Python? -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
YES! That would also solve the problems with Kathy's test engine. Indeed, we
could just replace test engine with rackunit in *sl. -- Matthias
On May 17, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 17 May 2011 08:57:26 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
While we're at it: any chance of
40 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 17 May 2011 08:57:26 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
While we're at it: any chance of getting a test-on-entry-point for
Rackunit as I described a while ago is available in Python?
I think we would want to implement it as a `#lang' mix-in
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:40:14AM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I had tried run-tests with 'verbose, and define-test-suite. I really
just have a file full of checks currently, I didn't need the case or
suite functionality yet.
(not to be a pita, but maybe you do! :)
Robby
I did try
(test/gui test-suite)
On May 17, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:40:14AM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I had tried run-tests with 'verbose, and define-test-suite. I really
just have a file full of checks currently, I didn't need the case or
suite
On 05/17/2011 06:12 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:34:39PM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:38 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
Folks,
I'm incredibly pleased with rackunit, having just used it on a funky
piece of parsing code, however I encountered a minor issue.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
--
Russell Adamsrlad...@adamsinfoserv.com
PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think we would want to implement it as a `#lang' mix-in
#lang testable racket
That sounds _great_.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
I believe Ryan offered to add something to add this functionality to
the text
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:39:45AM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
Save the old check-around handler:
(define base-check-around (current-check-around))
The new handler will call the thunk (ie, run the check), and if the
check succeeds (ie, does not raise an exception), then it prints out
a
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
Lol we use a gui at work for the business analysts to run acceptance
tests... not in
Folks,
I'm incredibly pleased with rackunit, having just used it on a funky
piece of parsing code, however I encountered a minor issue.
For all the checks I'm doing, it'd be useful if the check's output an
affirmative result, ie: Test X: OK. That'd help separate my test
output.
I didn't see an
14 matches
Mail list logo
