This is the problem on the line between codecompletion.jar and users individual setup. It look like sometimes Java process is being blocked by Antyvirus/Firewall. Not sure if it at any point influence Royale.
Piotr 2017-12-16 7:45 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > Last time I used Moonshine was before there was code completion. > Moonshine was able to call the FlexJS compiler without any extra setup, and > the FlexJS compiler is a Java app, so I'm trying to understand if there is > a setup issue for the latest Moonshine and why. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> > Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 2:10 PM > > To: "users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Moonshine IDE 1.7.0 Released > > Hi Alex, > > Moonshine is using nextgen plugin for code completion that's why we are > require Java JDK. Your question is why JDK instead JRE ? > > Thanks, Piotr > > 2017-12-15 18:42 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > >> I haven't tried Moonshine in a while. Why is there an issue with it >> needing a Java SDK? Is it really a JDK requirement or is a JRE >> sufficient? The Royale compiler requires a Java JRE so one should be >> around for Moonshine to leverage. I assume Moonshine can call the compiler >> without problem whether code completion is involved or not? >> >> Just wondering, >> -Alex >> >> From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> >> Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 3:48 AM >> To: "users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Moonshine IDE 1.7.0 Released >> >> Hi Olaf, >> >> Good point. We should consider to put that somewhere. >> >> Thanks! :) >> >> >> 2017-12-15 12:43 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net>: >> >>> Hi Piotr, >>> thank you! >>> >>> If I understand it correctly the Moonshine "CodeCompletition" feature >>> depends on a JAVA SDK. >>> Moreover, I found that there's a chance that it could be blocked by your >>> local firewall. >>> Maybe it would be helpful for others to add a something like a >>> "Requirements" section to "http://moonshine-ide.com >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmoonshine-ide.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf232837046144fc9338d08d543b1c285%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636489353107531289&sdata=nH%2FPoALBAVZIdnYcQlKtw9HWzzKGxYFg65s%2FaqmTVJc%3D&reserved=0>" >>> in order to document >>> such things? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Olaf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/ >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf232837046144fc9338d08d543b1c285%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636489353107531289&sdata=srnpt1pEUWv0XWfGK63oQPALOlP9usvUI6ZOiCEHroI%3D&reserved=0> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf232837046144fc9338d08d543b1c285%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636489353107531289&sdata=B5Pdi%2BUG%2FR546sMEi3VlG1Evo3jiCtOA0tzM1xE%2B7vk%3D&reserved=0>* >> > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C20ec7bb1747b4880f90c08d54408a148%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636489726222083409&sdata=3UoZBXsoBDrBhOGeL%2FDqP3xALnTneeH0NzZrgqn4Ja0%3D&reserved=0>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
