Great example Carlos.
Thank you very much.
I will play around with Royale and I have a few question that I will put in
different threads.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
With Flex I can use creationComplete with do stuff after the UI was rendered.
What is the equivalent for jewel/Roayle ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
I saw a Card in an example that extends from Group.
What is the purpose of using Card instead of Group ?
I didn't saw any implementation inside Card.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
I saw initialView in every example in Royale.
This seems strange for me.
Why not put the component instance directly on mxml ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Royale is the equivalent for in Flex/Spark ?
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
see "initComplete"
El sáb., 17 nov. 2018 a las 10:58, hferreira ()
escribió:
> With Flex I can use creationComplete with do stuff after the UI was
> rendered.
> What is the equivalent for jewel/Roayle ?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Hi Hugo,
Card is a component that is used in modern UI development (check material
design or other actual UI sets). In Flex Planel was something similar, but
Flex Panel use to have a titlebar with a close button and a controlbar.
Jewel Card, is in development, and right now is a Group with Vertica
No.
the strand/beads concept is one of the key concepts in Royale. Is
composition over inheritance and PAYG (pay as you go).
so each component is a strand and has an array of beads.
Some beads are configured in CSS
You can add more beads in mxml or via AS3
in that way you have the code more modula
maybe others could respond to this. That was as is when I came. I think
something similar was in Flex mobile components, although at that time I
think it was done that way to avoid instantiation of views and help the
poor mobile performance at that moment
El sáb., 17 nov. 2018 a las 11:02, hferrei
OK, I understand now.
For one hand it's better than Flex SDK and other frameworks, because avoids
to load tons of code that I don't need all the time.
For another hand I will end up with final mxml with more code but it's OK.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
--
Sent from: http://apache-
http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
OK, thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Hi Carlos,
OK, it's a Panel.
Thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Hi Hugo,
This exactly how Royale works. It's just mark that following View is
initial. You have more such of a section in whatever component you
creating. For example each component had section "model" or "beads".
I personally like the idea from the very beginning and haven't seen any
strange in
Hugo,
I think you should take a look close to that [1]. I think it is really
important to understand from the very beginning what PAYG actually is.
It saves you a lot of time and makes your eventually contribution to the
project on a good quality.
[1]
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/Welcome
OK, thank you.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Thank you very much.
Now I understand the Express and Basic and Strands and Beads.
Express ends up to be more what Flex is about but Basic + Strands and Beads
it's the best way to go.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
Basic cannot work without Jewel. It is correct ?
Jewel it's like a UI implementation using Basic like mx ou spark for Flex,
correct ?
So, what happens if I'm using Jewel and at some point I would like to
completely change my UI aspect ?
Or Jewel is the first implement, a set of UI with a default
Hugo,
First was Basic. Later Carlos introduce Jewel which is separate UI set and
not using Basic at all. I mean here that Jewel is not using Basic
components.
If you would like to use emulation + Jewel for good looking that probably
require some work.
In theory each component should work in the
Jewel which is separate UI set and not using Basic at all
> OK, like mx and spark in the Flex framework ?
emulation + Jewel for good looking that probably require some work
> As the first approach no.
first get compiled using emulation and then - Using those components make it
visible and working
I believe you could think like that like mx and spark, but probably going
deeper it can be a bit more.
I see this like that - If you jump and learn emulation components and how
to create and make them visible for your needs - You earn deeper knowledge
what is behind the stage. You will gain the po
Hi Alex,
I made compiler work, thanks.
I found out that namespace definitons in the beginning of file - in
application tag - causes compiler to hang.
e.g.
xmlns:comps="com.likya.pinara.comps.*"
When i remove these namespace definitions, than compiler goes on.
This workaround let me to cont
Let me preserve thread :
I found out that namespace definitions in the beginning of file - in
application tag - causes compiler to hang.
e.g.
xmlns:comps="com.likya.pinara.comps.*"
When i remove these namespace definitions, than compiler goes on.
This workaround let me to continue a little
And the most important more of your code won't need as much changes.
> Yes. In a framework change perspective is the cheapest approach but for
> now is not there iet (let's see in a near future), meanwhile I will check
> Royale without emulation.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.203
Applications have “initialize” and “applicationComplete”.
Components have “initComplete”.
> On Nov 17, 2018, at 1:02 PM, hferreira wrote:
>
> Code).
> It is normal ?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
That's it.
Thank you very much.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
How to add that cool debug toolbar to VS Code solution ?
Currently I have to do cmd + shift + p (macOS) to do a build-debug and then
I have to open the folder and then open the file on my browser.
I would like to:
1. Add that same toolbar
2. If possible when build, automatically open the index.html
I can run this sample
https://royale.apache.org/customization-through-the-royale-api nice and easy
with VS Code.
However this project was created with Moonshine.
I just grabbed the mxml source code and run on a test project.
The UI it's a basic one.
I saw a html template that probably it's the tem
The emulation components will have creationComplete if they don't have it
already.
On 11/17/18, 8:55 AM, "hferreira" wrote:
That's it.
Thank you very much.
--
Sent from:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-users.20374.n8
The Basic Application tries to encourage an MVC pattern to try to have clean
separation of data and views of data and controller logic. In theory, as you
eventually try to target other platforms/runtimes/devices, you may need to only
change the view or controller, but not the data if you have g
IT was my hope that more of the experienced committers on Royale would help get
the emulation components to run and train the newcomers. Unfortunately, that
has not happened so far, and I don't have enough time to do all of it myself in
short order. I keep hoping our committers will step up an
That’s a great discovery. Can you then build a small test case that reproduces
the problem so I can understand why it is hanging?
Thanks,
-Alex
From: Serkan Taş
Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Date: Saturday, November 17, 2018 at 7:34 AM
To: "users@royale.apache.org"
Subject: Re: royale-
35 matches
Mail list logo
