Coexistence of namespaces royale/basic and mx/spark

I think "basic" cannot coexist with "mx/spark". Is my understanding correct? The reason why I'm asking this is to use component in the mx/spark namespaces. I tried it but failed. The following markup is a simplified version of our mxml. It displays A4-size scanned image on the left side. There a

Re: flexlib

Alex, our application does not use flexlib so much. By scanning the source code, I could find the following cases. As to A and B, I'm sure flexlib functions are used. However, as to C, D, and E, I could not find the possible use of the flexlib functions. At present, I think the emulation work load

RE: flexlib

Yup. One of our prospective clients is using FlexLib as well. From: Alex Harui Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 10:15 AM To: users@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: flexlib Well, FlexLIb can’t be used as is because it depends on flash APIs and

Re: flexlib

Well, FlexLIb can’t be used as is because it depends on flash APIs and some lower-level Flex APIs. It would have to be migrated/emulated similar to how the MXRoyale and SparkRoyale work is going. Some FlexLib components will be more work to emulate than others. Sometimes most of the existing