sequence:
1. read sequence for a addresses from 0x1000 to 0xF000
2. trying to erase on 0xE000
3. drop to loop with a message:
*<4>JFFS2: Failed to allocate page buffer for verifying erase at
0xe000. Refiling*
Behavior can be different if I start playing with *SPIFLASH_BLOC
On 8/12/20 7:32 am, richard.glos...@l3harris.com wrote:
> Hi we are using the LEON3. Had been operating under rcc-1.3-rc7-gcc with
> correct operation of the JFFS2 file system. Recently attempted upgrade to
> rcc-1.3.0-gcc (RTEMS 5.1 release) and now are getting segmentation fault
>
Hi we are using the LEON3. Had been operating under rcc-1.3-rc7-gcc with
correct operation of the JFFS2 file system. Recently attempted upgrade to
rcc-1.3.0-gcc (RTEMS 5.1 release) and now are getting segmentation fault
whenever we attempt to access the /mnt/jffs drive in any way. I have
Hi we are using the LEON3. Had been operating under rcc-1.3-rc7-gcc with
correct operation of the JFFS2 file system. Recently attempted upgrade to
rcc-1.3.0-gcc (RTEMS 5.1 release) and now are getting segmentation fault
whenever we attempt to access the /mnt/jffs drive in any way. I have
Hello,
My setup is RTEMS 4-11.3 on a STM32H7 with an external QSPI flash
(IS25LP016D).
I have to write the code that communicates with IS25LP016D to accomplish
read/write/erase.
I want to use JFFS2 FS on this flash device. Since I'm not very familiar
with JFFS2
internals yet, just a few questions
#define CONFIGURE_INIT
#include
#endif
>>Any output from JFFS2 during the mount?
No, it's keep quite just hanging.
>>What is the errno?
Failed with: Not enough space
Thanks.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 07:21, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 03/09/
( stuff).
Any output from JFFS2 during the mount?
What is the errno?
Maybe you have to step through the mount() call with a debugger to
figure out what is wrong.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49
Hello,
Now I'm struggling with mounting of jffs2 using my qspiflash driver.
main.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "config.h"
#include "user.h"
#include "spiflash.h"
#define SPIFLASH_BLOCK_SIZE (0x100)
#d
On 02/07/2019 20:24, richard.glos...@l3harris.com wrote:
Trying to get a build with jffs2 file system included for rcc-1.3-rc6.
Defined CONFIGURE_FILESYSTEM_JFFS2 and now am getting an undefined
reference linker error for rtems_jffs2_initialize(). Tried adding
–ljffs2 to the linker command
Trying to get a build with jffs2 file system included for rcc-1.3-rc6. Defined
CONFIGURE_FILESYSTEM_JFFS2 and now am getting an undefined reference linker
error for rtems_jffs2_initialize(). Tried adding -ljffs2 to the linker command
line but still get the error. #define
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 11:40 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 13/07/18 00:50, Russell Haley wrote:
> > While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most
> > likely port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
> >
> >
On 13/07/18 00:50, Russell Haley wrote:
While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most
likely port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHFS
Is this file system actually used and maintained?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 5:51 PM Russell Haley wrote:
> While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most likely
> port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHFS
>
> For what it's worth
>
It's worth something. :)
It came up before
While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most likely
port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHFS
For what it's worth,
Russ
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
for NAND flashes you can use YAFFS2:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems-yaffs2.git/
You need a license for commercial products:
https://yaffs.net/yaffs-licence-faqs
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
Does JFFS2 provide bad block management and wear leveling? If so, is there
anything we need to do to enable it?
Sent from my iPhone
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
: ThomasDörfler
Date: 2018-01-30 15:02
To: bin wang; rtems-us...@rtems.org
Subject: Re: jffs2 summary problem
Hello Ben,
the RTEMS community is always happy to see the functionality growning,
especially with additions, which are useful to real life applications.In
general I think there are three options
to get it done and to get it integrated
2.) find someone who has spare time to do it
3.) fund the corresponding work with the money required
If a faster startup of the existing jffs2 RTEMS port is crucial for you, option
3 may be interesting for you. Among others, we at embedded brains can create
>On 30/01/18 05:16, bin.w...@qkmtech.com wrote:
>> hi everyone
>>
>> now i use jffs2 as my flash filesystem. but the time of the scan the
>> device is two long , i find that someone said that when i set the
>> CONFIG_JFFS2_SUMMARY macro ，the time will re
On 30/01/18 05:16, bin.w...@qkmtech.com wrote:
hi everyone
now i use jffs2 as my flash filesystem. but the time of the scan the
device is two long , i find that someone said that when i set the
CONFIG_JFFS2_SUMMARY macro ，the time will reduce too much。
This looks like a Linux
hi everyone
now i use jffs2 as my flash filesystem. but the time of the scan the device
is two long , i find that someone said that when i set the
CONFIG_JFFS2_SUMMARY macro ，the time will reduce too much。
but i did not find the realization of the summary. i only find the summary.h
21 matches
Mail list logo
